The support is appreciated. Nonetheless, the goal here is to improve our knowledge. That can only occur when new ideas face close scrutiny and survive informed criticism. @DS3 was on point to bring up the subject of direct metabolism of bound testosterone. But his other comments are mainly vague skepticism, which is hard to address.
Yes sir and i can see your theories are well researched and put together based off factual evidence, not hocus pocus. And i thought the point here was to battle it out to see who is the smartest most knowledgable?