Im still interested in your hypothesis on how does the increase of serum E2 cause a permanent worsening of ones symptoms. What do you think is the mechanism behind that?
Based on my own research, epigenetics would be the only logical and plausible explanation. I am not sure through what mechanism increasing endogenous E2 makes my symptoms worse but if I had to speculate it's through epigenetic alteration i.e. methylation of a gene, which would further silence my ER in target cells. If you look at this simplified diagram, methyl groups attract more, which further represses the gene. But still, I don't know why increasing E2 worsens the signal.
I can provide breast cancer studies that show ER function on the cancer cells become insensitive to estradiol, and grow with or without estradiol. I can even provide a study that shows a paradoxical effect of estradiol on breast cancer cells, where estradiol administration causes apoptosis of cells. I've said it multiple times, when my E2 raises (via larger testosterone shot or even use of Tamoxifen or Clomid, two drugs I've used in the past with a desired effect and no ADRs), I feel like I am going through chemotherapy- severe mental agitation, severe anxiety, absolutely no appetite, severe ED, and worsening of all other symptoms. But when my E2 is stable, like it is right now, I don't have any anxiety or mental agitation, and the ED isn't as severe.
Like I said, I don't know. It's bizzare and unfair. Increasing E2 used to make me feel mentally and physical great. I'm so angry I ever used Arimidex. I am going to leave the mechanism up to doctors and researchers once this is finally investigated.
In regards to your other post with the EIS studies in the male and female. I am on TRT so my E2 would not be supraphysiological like it is in these studies. I do not have any output of LH and FSH.
Also, these patients have a congenital condition, a gene mutation in the base DNA. It's not a epigenetic matter. Based on my theory, my symptoms get worse because the receptor gets further silenced when E2 is increased. This won't happen in a DNA mutation. What's done is done and no further changes can be made in the base DNA.
Lastly, it's important to know how the libido and erectile function were evaluated. To this man, for all he could know, his erectile function could realistically be 80%, but he thinks it's 100% because he never experienced a true healthy erection. If I was born with this, I would think my erection is 100% because it still gets hard. But since I was not born with this, and I know what an incredible erection feels like, I would say my erection is 70-75% of what it was. It's all relative. Same concept with libido.
I hope this makes sense.
Last edited: