M
MarkM
Guest
A lot of people think E2 should be in a ratio to testosterone .
"The healthy ratio should be above 14 (ng/dl of T divided by m=pg/ml of E2) from two small studies on fertility. "
https://www.excelmale.com/forum/thr...estradiol-levels-the-facts.15905/#post-118843
Here is a thread taking in more detail about the ratio. However, it doesn't seem to be a well proven theory.
I ask because last blood test my TT was 1389, FT 28.4 and sensitive E2 56.2. According to the ratio theory I am at 24.8 and me E2 should actually be higher like at least 70.
I am not doing anything because I expect my TT to decline and with it E2, and as far as symptoms perhaps I am a little more bitchy than usual, but I have always been sarcastic so hard to tell if it's unusual and no other symptoms that I can see.
So when looking at E2 levels, do you all factor in TT and FT at all?
Nelson said based on this theory that the ratio should fall between a range of 14 to 20 for a healthy level of estradiol. I think the T:E2 ratio has to be taken with a grain of salt or within reason. Like you Dragon, my Total T is 1050 and my E2 is 35.3 which give me a ratio of 29.8 and using the theory my E2 should be fall within a range of 53 to 75 which I think would be too high for me.
However, I did have E2 for a while of 67, which would fall within the "theory range" for my numbers and I did not have high E2 symptoms but it was only for a month or two. Damn, maybe that theory is more accurate than I thought it was.