Results: SubQ vs IM @ 70mg/week

Buy Lab Tests Online
Where are you getting your propionate now? Defy no longer carries as you probably already know.
Various UGL sources. Readalot has been doing a remarkable job encouraging some of them to improve their testing. Between purity, metals, sterility, and now endotoxin, there's more documentation available for some of these UGL products than you can get from Empower or other pharmacies. They also generally use Miglyol 812 which is a superior carrier oil vs. grapeseed or sesame.
 
Defy Medical TRT clinic doctor
Various UGL sources. Readalot has been doing a remarkable job encouraging some of them to improve their testing. Between purity, metals, sterility, and now endotoxin, there's more documentation available for some of these UGL products than you can get from Empower or other pharmacies. They also generally use Miglyol 812 which is a superior carrier oil vs. grapeseed or sesame.
Didn’t realize you were back on prop. I’ve decided to give the solvent free props try and it’s been working well for me!
 
Didn’t realize you were back on prop. I’ve decided to give the solvent free props try and it’s been working well for me!
What do you mean by solvent free? Are you referring to prop's ingredient BENZYL BENZOATE?
Can you or @FunkOdyssey refer me to the forum thread on this? I have not been following the propionate shortage news.
 
What do you mean by solvent free? Are you referring to prop's ingredient BENZYL BENZOATE?
Can you or @FunkOdyssey refer me to the forum thread on this? I have not been following the propionate shortage news.
Yep, no benzyl benzoate. I’ve found I’m extremely sensitive to it, I can only use enanthate, cream or solvent free prop.

Is it ok if I DM you the source? Idk if we’re allowed to talk about UGL openly
 
What's the longest you've stayed on propionate? I experienced overstimulation followed by an evening crash in early days with prop, but it eventually went away. IME, the fully-adapted-to-propionate state is superior to the same point in an enanthate protocol, but I know everyone reacts differently, if that isn't the case for you.
Have you had your blood test done on test prop?
If so, what are your numbers like?
Are still at 25mg a day?:)
 
Have you had your blood test done on test prop?
If so, what are your numbers like?
Are still at 25mg a day?:)
I have some peak levels from an overdosed pharmacom prop (I was running 25 mg a day of something labeled 50 mg/mL but I think it was actually 100 mg/mL based on labs) and some peak levels from 30 mg daily of a correctly dosed prop. I'm not going to get into the details at this time, except to say that levels were too high in both cases.

I'm currently running 18 mg a day (126 mg weekly) which provides testosterone comparable to 140 mg enanthate weekly. When I get some proper trough and peak values on this I'll post them.
 
Yep, no benzyl benzoate. I’ve found I’m extremely sensitive to it, I can only use enanthate, cream or solvent free prop.

Is it ok if I DM you the source? Idk if we’re allowed to talk about UGL openly
Yes thanks. Can you also link to the propionate thread where Readalot was discussing the purity tests?

I have often thought the benzyl benzoate was causing me some issues. And it was significant in Empower's formulation:
Propionate (100mg/ml): Benzyl Benzoate 15% / Benzyl Alcohol 1% as preservative

Sorry to the OP for hijacking this thread!
 
No, I’m talking about a different type of oral testosterone, commercially available. Jatenzo and Kyzatrex. These both have clinical trials showing the efficiency rating to be quite high, comparable or better than injections with regards to side effects.
I think the Jatenzo/Kyzatrek overall are the closet to physiological we have, where do you get yours and how much monthly do you pay? I have been thinking to try it for a while now
 
Yep, no benzyl benzoate. I’ve found I’m extremely sensitive to it, I can only use enanthate, cream or solvent free prop.

Is it ok if I DM you the source? Idk if we’re allowed to talk about UGL openly
Hi, I've been following this thread and have long been wondering where I can get better info about UGL options. Any lead you are comfortable sharing with me I'd appreciate, either a UGL you think is reliable or explain what "Readalot" is, I apologize for my ignorance. Many thanks. Dave
 
I have some peak levels from an overdosed pharmacom prop (I was running 25 mg a day of something labeled 50 mg/mL but I think it was actually 100 mg/mL based on labs) and some peak levels from 30 mg daily of a correctly dosed prop. I'm not going to get into the details at this time, except to say that levels were too high in both cases.

I'm currently running 18 mg a day (126 mg weekly) which provides testosterone comparable to 140 mg enanthate weekly. When I get some proper trough and peak values on this I'll post them.

What were you expecting here that is a shitload of T!

30 mg TP daily (210 mg/week) is an absurd weekly dose of T!

Would be the equivalent of banging 249 mg TC/week which is beyond the top-end therapeutic dose of T.

As you should very well know 200 mg T/week is overkill for most!

The majority of men on TTh would never even need 200 mg T week in order to achieve a healthy let alone high trough FT!

Gotta love that UGL too LOL!
 
Hi, I've been following this thread and have long been wondering where I can get better info about UGL options. Any lead you are comfortable sharing with me I'd appreciate, either a UGL you think is reliable or explain what "Readalot" is, I apologize for my ignorance. Many thanks. Dave
No worries, Funk actually posted the name in here earlier- pharmacom. I will send you the link. It’s what I’m using until I can find a local compounding pharmacy that makes solvent free propionate. I’m going to start calling around once the holiday season is over.
 
Hi, I've been following this thread and have long been wondering where I can get better info about UGL options. Any lead you are comfortable sharing with me I'd appreciate, either a UGL you think is reliable or explain what "Readalot" is, I apologize for my ignorance. Many thanks. Dave
Doesn’t look like your PMs are open, the company is pharmacom however. Again, temporary until I get a white market solution
 
Is this hard on the liver?

No it would be from use of the 17α-alkylated orals such as stanozolol, oxandrolone, methyltestosterone, methandrostenolone, oxymetholone, and fluoxymesterone as they are notorious for driving down HDL, increasing LDL, stressing the liver and hammering down SHBG.

Even then the dose/duration of use will play a big role.










Oral TU (Jatenzo, Tlando, Kyzatrex) and throw in the first oral TU formulation Andriol which was released in 1970!

* [1]. Systemic delivery of oral TU occurs instantly (>97%) via the intestinal lymphatic system thus bypassing the liver completely.




Oral TU development

TU was first introduced in Europe in the 1970s as Andriol, an esterified form of testosterone that bypassed first-pass metabolism in the liver and, when coupled with an oleic acid vehicle, increased lymphatic absorption in the gut.25,27 Andriol was approved in many countries but never in the United States due in part to high dependence of concentration on dietary fat intake.28–31 The oleic acid vehicle used to increase absorption required Andriol to be refrigerated to maintain stability.25 The Andriol formulation was updated to a castor oil and propylene glycol vehicle in a new formulation (Andriol Testocaps), which increased the shelf life of the medication, improved the consistency in drug concentration, and reduced the effect of dietary fat.23,25,32 This necessitated multiple capsules throughout the day to maintain adequate drug levels.23

Advancements to the
self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) allowed for the development of novel oral TU formulations (JATENZO®, Clarus Therapeutics, Northbrook, IL, United States; TLANDO®, Antares Pharma, Inc.,San Diego, CA, United States) that produced physiologic concentrations of testosterone without concern for meal fat content.33–36 Another oral formulation of TU uses a phytosterol carrier vehicle (KYZATREXTM, Marius Pharmaceuticals, Raleigh, NC, United States).7,25
TU safety

Oral formulations of TU bear a warning citing possible hepatic adverse effects following prolonged use of 17-alpha-alkyl androgens (methyltestosterone).6-8 Although oral TU therapies have demonstrated a lack of hepatic AEs in clinical studies and evidence supports the lymphatic absorption of oral TU, these therapies are still regarded with trepidation concerning the potential for hepatic adverse events.33,34,39 In the following section, we discuss safety findings pertaining to the liver from studies of currently available oral TU products (Table 2).




Testosterone undecanoate

Studies have shown that the first form of oral TU, andriol, was rarely associated with decreased liver function.




JATENZO

Studies have shown that treatment with JATENZO has not led to increased LFTs or clinically significant liver toxicities.




TLANDO

Studies with TLANDO have shown that oral TU is not associated with increased LFTs and may demonstrate a positive liver effect.




KYZATREX


KYZATREX (NCT03198728), 314 patients were randomized to receive KYZATREX 400 mg in the morning and 200 mg in the evening titrated based on plasma testosterone or AndroGel 1.65%.52 Patients were assessed for change from baseline to end of treatment (time of early withdrawal or at day 365) LFTs (ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and ALP).52 Results showed greater change from baseline in LFTs for KYZATREX compared to AndroGel for ALP, ALT, and bilirubin, and no improvement in AST: mean (SD) change from baseline: ALP,−4 (11.31) vs −1.5 (10.37) U/L; ALT, −0.4 (19.84) vs 0.9(14.64) U/L; bilirubin, −0.032 (0.2157) vs 0.026 (0.2117) mg/dL; and AST 2.4 (27.18) vs 1.0 (9.69) U/L. No liver-related AEs were identified.52 Further research into the effect that KYZATREX has on liver safety is needed to assess whether there is concern for Hy’s law and DILI.




* Overall, oral TU studies have shown that contrary to concerns about the previous formulations of oral TU therapy, which contained methylated testosterone, the newer formulations of oral TU are safer in relation to liver assessments.
 
Trough time at really low levels injecting TP daily would be minimal for the majority as most are still running high/absurdly high troughs let alone there would still be strong suppression of the hpta even when running mid-normal trough T levels in the physiological range.

Formulation/PKs, dosing protocol/minimum effective doses needed to raise T levels in order to achieve a healthy FT level in order to provide relief/improvement of symptoms will results in suppression of the hpta.

Long and medium-acting injectable esterified TU/TC/TE/mixed will have the strongest impact.

Again as I have stated numerous times on the forum even short-acting injectable esterified TP can still have a strong suppressive effect on the hpta!

As I stated in a previous thread when using daily short-acting TP the T levels achieved peak vs trough let alone the time period over those 24 hrs T levels are elevated whether mid-range/high/absurdly high will still result in a strong suppression of the hpta.

Top it off there are many of those clueless SHEEP injecting daily TP hitting very high/absurdly high peaks let alone high-end/high troughs!

In such cases you are still hammering the shit out of your dopamine!

I’m interested in hearing more about the impact of different dosing protocols on dopamine.

What, in your opinion, would be an ideal protocol for someone who is interested in achieving levels sufficient for symptom resolution and who is also interested in having the least impact on dopamine?

For example, keeping total weekly dose roughly equal, would cream have a lesser impact on dopamine than injections? What about the differences between smaller daily injections vs twice per week injections?
 
Last edited:
I’m interested in hearing more about the impact of different dosing protocols on dopamine.

What, in your opinion, would be an ideal protocol for someone who is interested in achieving levels sufficient for symptom resolution and who is also interested in having the least impact on dopamine?

For example, keeping total weekly dose roughly equal, would cream have a lesser impact on dopamine than injections? What about the differences between smaller daily injections vs twice per week injections?

Once you venture beyond the physiologic range especially steady-state - 24/7 you are going to be hammering the s**t out of dopamine!

Temporary short-live supra-physiological spikes are not so bad.

Ideal protocol would most likely be daily short-lived peaks with longer trough times at sensible/lower-end levels.

This could be achieved with nasal T-gel dosed 2-3X daily, oral TU dosed 2X daily, sensible daily doses of TP depending on the dose and what peak/trough level one achieves or for some transdermal cream depending on the dose and what peak/trough level one achieves.

Even though propionate is a short-acting ester most men injecting daily are still running around with a mid-range or better yet high/absurdly high trough which result in a strong suppression of the hpta let alone the knumbskulls running the high/absurdly high daily troughs are going to be hammering the s**t out their dopamine!

When using TC/TE running a sensible trough would most likely be beneficial but even then you still need to keep the injection frequency in mind as again there is a big difference in the peak--->trough injecting daily vs twice-weekly vs once weekly.

Some men definitely feel better with the bigger swings in peak--->trough whereas others feel better with more stable blood levels throughout the week.

Unfortunately too many are caught up in the more T is better mentality aiming for these trough TT 1000-1000+ ng/dL with high/absurdly high trough FT levels and this is across the board here no matter what injection frequency as in dailies, EOD, M/W/F, twice-weekly (every 3.5 days) and god forbid once weekly!

Again big difference in one hitting a high/very high trough FT injecting daily vs twice-weekly vs once weekly!

Most men have blown past there genetic set-point!

You get the point here.

Another down fall here is too many are jacked up on T from the get-go which shocks the system let alone most would fare better running much lower levels.

When these guys end up running into issues/sides, elevated H/H/RBCs, loss of/lowered libido, erectile dysfunction the smart ones will try lower doses but unfortunately many feel worse off coming down vs going up let alone many never even give a lower dose protocol a fair shake.

Many still lack the understanding of how exogenous T works.

As I have stated numerous times on the forum over the years when starting TTH or tweaking a protocol (increasing/decreasing dose of T) hormones will be in flux during the weeks leading up until blood levels have stabilized (4-6 weeks TC/TE) and it is common for one to experience ups (increasing T dose) or downs (decreasing T dose) along the way as the body is trying to adjust.

Common when first starting TTh or tweaking a protocol (increasing dose of T) to experience what we call the honeymoon period increased energy, euphoric like state, increased libido and erections due to rising hormones, dopamine boost and lighting up of the ARs.

Addictive but unfortunately this is short-lived/temporary as the body will eventually adapt.

Unfortunately many will keep chasing this to no avail, jack up your dose further bruh!

Dead end road here!

As you should very well know the first 6 weeks is misleading when looking at the bigger picture.

Even then once blood levels have stabilized it will still take time (a few more months) for the body to adapt to its new set-point and this is the critical time period when one needs to gauge how they truly feel overall regarding relief/improvement of low-t symptoms and overall well-being.

Every protocol needs to be given a fair shake/fighting chance before claiming whether it was truly a success or failure.

The uniformed ones tend to bailout 6 weeks in because they do not feel good and end up bailing out early.

The ones starting out on TTh end up increasing their dose thinking that higher levels are needed.

The ones that were jacked upon T from the get-go end up going back on the higher dose claiming they do not feel good on lower doses.

Put money on it if you put one on T for a 6 month trial and started them off low and slow on a T-only protocol and never let them see labs 6 weeks in let alone the 3 and 6 month mark and went by symptom relief slowly increasing the dose at 6 weeks if needed then 3 month mark if needed and 6 month mark if needed many would end up running much lower levels than they think would have been needed!

To many caught up on these so called HRT/men's health forums loaded with all those blast n cruisers let alone so called gurus polluting the net have already been brainwashed by the more T is better sheep mentality bulls**t!
 
Various UGL sources. Readalot has been doing a remarkable job encouraging some of them to improve their testing. Between purity, metals, sterility, and now endotoxin, there's more documentation available for some of these UGL products than you can get from Empower or other pharmacies. They also generally use Miglyol 812 which is a superior carrier oil vs. grapeseed or sesame.
Don't some people have bad reactions to Miglyol?
 
Buy Lab Tests Online
Defy Medical TRT clinic

Sponsors

bodybuilder test discounted labs
cheap enclomiphene
TRT in UK Balance my hormones
Discounted Labs
Testosterone Doctor Near Me
Testosterone books nelson vergel
Register on ExcelMale.com
Trimix HCG Offer Excelmale
BUY HCG CIALIS

Online statistics

Members online
10
Guests online
222
Total visitors
232

Latest posts

Back
Top