chad386
New Member
Maybe iny missing something, but making drastic changes to a protocol or stopping a protocol altogether just to chase a lab number doesn't make much sense to me, particularly in regard to PSA.
I read the book 'The Great Prostate Hoax' a few years back by the guy that actually invented the PSA test. It's a horrible test with a crazy high number of false positives.
Has something changed significantly in the recent past to invalidate his opinion? I genuinely don't know. But I'm also not the type to make big changes to a protocol that's working just to make my quarterly report card from quest labs look a certain way. A lot of times I'll change nothing and deviant readings go back to normal the next test.
I read the book 'The Great Prostate Hoax' a few years back by the guy that actually invented the PSA test. It's a horrible test with a crazy high number of false positives.
Has something changed significantly in the recent past to invalidate his opinion? I genuinely don't know. But I'm also not the type to make big changes to a protocol that's working just to make my quarterly report card from quest labs look a certain way. A lot of times I'll change nothing and deviant readings go back to normal the next test.