DHT: How High is Too High

I have pumpkin seed oil and quercetin coming. After that may give saw palmetto a try. I really don't want to try fin/dut....to many horror stories with those.
Of course I know about Fina duta possible negative effects. I tried a small dose of topical Fina few times and it always caused mood disturbances. I think your case is different, you seem to have an extreme abundance of 5-a-reductase. I would start with a really small dose. I believe that the herbal stuff is not strong enough in your case because you need to reduce DHT more than a few percentages. If you don't mind the hair redistribution then only titrating up E2 could work too.
 
Of course I know about Fina duta possible negative effects. I tried a small dose of topical Fina few times and it always caused mood disturbances. I think your case is different, you seem to have an extreme abundance of 5-a-reductase. I would start with a really small dose. I believe that the herbal stuff is not strong enough in your case because you need to reduce DHT more than a few percentages. If you don't mind the hair redistribution then only titrating up E2 could work too.
I have HCG coming, I had to resort to UGL for the estradiol vial I broke. I know the tablets are easy to get but I heard they are hard on the liver.
 
I had more hair loss on higher dose test prop (25-30 mg daily), than on 20 mg prop with pure DHT added in top via gel which raised my DHT over 300 ng/dL.

The pure DHT is a great way to experiment with this in a more controlled fashion.
Do you think even a low dose of DHT gel would suppress endogenous testosterone in a man not on TRT?
 
Do you think even a low dose of DHT gel would suppress endogenous testosterone in a man not on TRT?
I assume it's highly dependent on both the dose and the individual. Though speculative, it's possible that taking Cistanche extract simultaneously would hedge against suppressive effects. The echinacoside in this extract appears to have SARM-like effects, blocking androgen receptors in the hypothalamus, and thus reducing negative HPTA feedback. [R]
 
Do you think even a low dose of DHT gel would suppress endogenous testosterone in a man not on TRT?
This has been tested before, and the answer is yes, at least somewhat. If you can get the full text of this study, you'll have more details on just how suppressive DHT was. I would be most interested in the serum level of DHT produced and how that relates to suppression, because I don't know how to equate the 125-200 mg dosage they studied to the Alpha Gels product.

 
"
Idan and colleagues report results from a comprehensive trial in 114 healthy, eugonadal men who received 2 years of either DHT treatment with a transdermal, pharmacologic dose of 70 mg DHT gel daily, or matching placebo gel.

As expected, the DHT-treated group had a 10-fold increase in serum DHT levels, well above the normal range of circulating DHT, and a concomitant decrease in serum testosterone and estradiol concentrations which were all unchanged in the placebo group.

The extremely high serum levels of DHT achieved in this study lead to significant gonadotropin suppression, thereby reducing circulating testosterone levels to nearly castrate levels and reducing circulating estradiol levels by 90%. The most concerning outcome of this study is the effect of high dose DHT gel on bone mineral density. Over 2 years, the subjects receiving DHT gel had a significant, progressive decrease in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine compared to placebo, despite expected anabolic effects on lean body mass.
"

Nothing mentioned about hair growth changes. Research focused on prostate.
 
Do you think even a low dose of DHT gel would suppress endogenous testosterone in a man not on TRT?


* All subjects administered 5 g DHT (125 mg DHT) or placebo gel daily for the first 30 d, whereafter the dose was adjusted by a outside person (i.e. blind to the principal investigators) on the basis of serum DHT measurement performed 20 d after study entry. If serum DHT was less than 5.8 nmol/liter, the men used a daily dose of 250 mg, if serum DHT was between 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 187.5 mg, and if serum DHT was over 11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 125 mg. The purpose was to reach the upper limit of 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, which has been found to be the range at which a daily dose of 5 g gel is used (12). The dose of placebo was adjusted randomly by an outside person; 30 subjects continued with 5 g, and 30 used either 7.5 or 10 g.


* Serum DHT concentrations were measured by RIA after organic extraction and hydrophobic chromatography. The lower limit of quantification of serum DHT was 0.1 nmol/liter. The normal range for DHT was 1–10 nmol/liter, and the intra- and inter assay coefficients of variation were 9.1% and 6.6%, respectively. In previous studies the basal serum levels of DHT have been found to be 1.5–2.0 nmol/liter in men between 50–70 yr of age (5, 15, 16) and 2.5–3.5 nmol/liter in men between19–29 yr of age (16).


* After 1 month of DHT treatment, 23% of the subjects used a daily dose of 125 mg, 45% used 187.5 mg, and 32% used 250 mg. The serum concentrations of DHT and other hormones are shown in Table 2. For comparison, the FAI and serum DHT concentrations of healthy men are shown in Table 1.


* DHT treatment decreased serum concentrations of E2, T, and SHBG (P < 0.001–0.003; Table 2). Similarly, serum concentrations of LH and FSH decreased in the DHT group compared with the placebo group.


* This first placebo-controlled study carried out with DHT demonstrated a number of changes in both clinical and biochemical parameters in response to percutaneous DHT administration in men with relatively low bioavailable serum T levels and andropause symptoms.

* Treatment with percutaneous DHT gel increased serum total DHT levels 5-fold and led to concentrations that were clearly above the normal young adult male range (16). Although serum T concentrations decreased simultaneously with DHT administration by 50–70%, it is apparent that the total androgen effect increased significantly, especially because serum SHBG levels decreased simultaneously. This is supported by the observation that percutaneous T and DHT have an equal androgen effect in patients with hypogonadism (20),



* As expected and observed previously (15), serum FSH and LH concentrations decreased during DHT treatment as a result of the negative feedback effect. The long-term effect of DHT on testicular function, e.g. on spermatogenesis, is not yet known, but no evidence of irreversible effects exists (20).








Subjects and Methods

Subjects


A total of 120 males, aged 50–70 yr (mean age, 58 yr), participated in this monocenter, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study (Fig. 1, flow chart). Based on a telephone conversation or a clinic visit, 178 subjects were known to fulfill the symptom criteria, and they were asked to come for screening. Of them, 55 failed to enter th estudy because of abnormal lipid or liver parameters, high serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA; 10 g/liter), or other reasons. The subjects were randomized to the DHT (n 60) or the placebo (n 60) group. The randomization codes identifying the treatment were kept in sealed envelopes and were broken only after all clinical and biochemical analyses were completed. None of the envelopes had to be opened before completing the study. Subjects included should have had rarefaction of nocturnal penile tumescence (once or less per wk; frequency of early morning erections together with libido are known to have correlation with serum androgen levels) and at least one of the following andropause symptoms: decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, urinary disorders, asthenia, or depressive mood. In addition, the subjects had to have a total serum T concentration of 15 nmol/liter or less (normal range, 9–32 nmol/liter) and/or an SHBG level greater than 30 nmol/liter (normal range, 14–62 nmol/liter). Although serum T levels of 15 nmol/liter or less and SHBG levels greater than 30 nmol/liter do not define all subjects as being hypogonadal or having low free T, these limits were used together with clinical symptoms to find men who would benefit from the treatment.The number of subjects in each category is given in Table 1. Five subjects in the DHT group and nine in the placebo group (P 0.175) had been treated earlier for impotence problems. The exclusion criteria with regard to prostate were prostate weight greater than 100 g, serum PSA level greater than 10 g/liter, acute prostatitis, abnormal prostate in clinical or ultrasonographic examination, or prostatectomy/transurethral resection of the prostate. The other main exclusion criteria were significant cardiovascular disease, abnormal lipid profile (total cholesterol 7.5 mmol/liter and/or triglycerides 1.7 mmol/liter), alcohol abuse, and uncured cancer. Furthermore, subjects with neurological impotence, major depression, or other psychiatric diseases, and those taking hormones or drugs affecting sexual function, lipid/hormone metabolism (-blockers, methyldopa, clonidine,guanethine thiazide diuretics, spironolactone, digitalis, barbiturates, clofibrate, cimetidine, metochlopramide, or antidepressive and neuroleptic drugs), or hematological parameters were excluded. Three subjects (1 taking DHT: unstable hypertension; 2 taking placebo: coronary heart disease with metoprolol medication and skin cancer) were wrongly included in the study; therefore, 3 additional men were randomized. Six men in the DHT group dropped out before the end of the trial (Fig. 1). The reasons for drop-out were withdrawal of consent (n 2), lack of efficacy (n 2), contact lost (n 1), and acute pyoelonephritis due to prostatitis (n 1). For comparison, the serum concentrations of DHT in 35 healthy men, aged 50–67 yr, and the free androgen index (FAI) in 146 healthy men, aged 20–65 yr, were analyzed.




Protocol

DHT and placebo gel were prepared and packed in identical tubes by Laboratories Besins Iscovesco (Paris, France). Both the study drug and placebo were opalescent gels with alcoholic odor, and they were applied on upper arms/shoulders and on abdomen if necessary. The DHT gel contained a 2.5% solution of DHT. After application the gel dried rapidly in a few minutes. The subjects were asked to wash their hands after application and to pay attention to any skin irritation observed. All subjects administered 5 g DHT (125 mg DHT) or placebo gel daily for the first 30 d, whereafter the dose was adjusted by a outside person (i.e. blind to the principal investigators) on the basis of serum DHT measurement performed 20 d after study entry. If serum DHT was less than 5.8 nmol/liter, the men used a daily dose of 250 mg, if serum DHT was between 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 187.5 mg, and if serum DHT was over 11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 125 mg. The purpose was to reach the upper limit of 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, which has been found to be the range at which a daily dose of 5 g gel is used (12). The dose of placebo was adjusted randomly by an outside person; 30 subjects continued with 5 g, and 30 used either 7.5 or 10 g. All tubes were returned and weighed to ensure compliance, and no significant failures were observed. The effect of DHT on general well-being was evaluated by questionnaire (13 questions), which was modified from the Psychological General Well-Being scale (13), and 12 questions regarding sexual function were modified from the International Index of Erectile Function(14). For example, the scoring system for the early morning erections was: 1 never, 2 every other month, 3 every month, 4 every other week, 5 every week, 6 two times a week or more. After the screening visit and entry, follow-up visits were made at 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment, and the subjects filled out the questionnaire before entry andat 3 and 6 months.




Laboratory techniques

Serum DHT concentrations were measured by RIA after organic extraction and hydrophobic chromatography. The lower limit of quantification of serum DHT was 0.1 nmol/liter. The normal range for DHT was 1–10 nmol/liter, and the intra- and inter assay coefficients of variation were 9.1% and 6.6%, respectively. In previous studies the basal serum levels of DHT have been found to be 1.5–2.0 nmol/liter in men between 50–70 yr of age (5, 15, 16) and 2.5–3.5 nmol/liter in men between19–29 yr of age (16). Serum T concentrations were measured using a ACS:180 chemiluminescence system with an ACS:180 analyzer (ChironCorp., Emeryville, CA). Serum E2 concentrations were measured by RIA(Orion Diagnostica, Turku, Finland). Serum SHBG, LH, FSH and PSA concentrations were quantified by two-site fluoroimmunometric methods with kits obtained from Wallac, Inc. (Turku, Finland), using a 1235 AutoDELFIA automatic immunoassay system. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 4.0% and 5.6% for T, 5.7% and 6.4% for E2,1.3% and 5.1% for SHBG, 4.9% and 6.5% for LH, 3.8% and 4.3% for FSH,and 1.2% and 3.8% for PSA, respectively. The FAI was calculated according to the equation: (T 100)/SHBG. Hematological analyses and biochemical measurements were performed using approved routine clinical chemistry methods (Oulu University Hospital).




Results

After 1 month of DHT treatment, 23% of the subjects used a daily dose of 125 mg, 45% used 187.5 mg, and 32% used 250 mg. The serum concentrations of DHT and other hormones are shown in Table 2. For comparison, the FAI and serum DHT concentrations of healthy men are shown in Table 1. The score of early morning erection improved significantly in the DHT group during the first 3 months of treatment (from 3.0 to 3.9; P 0.003). The ability to maintain erections in subjects taking DHT improved significantly compared with that in subjects using placebo (Table 3). There were no statistically significant differences in general well-being, libido, mood, or vitality between the groups. However, the placebo effect was statistically significant in several questions: mood, briskness, self confidence, depression, activity, cheerfulness, and relaxation improved in both groups; libido, general interest in everyday life, and energy in the placebo group; and satisfaction with sexual life in the DHT group. Serum PSA concentrations did not change during the treatment. Similarly, prostate size and International Prostate Symptoms Score (I-PPS) remained unchanged (Table 4).

DHT treatment decreased serum concentrations of E2, T, and SHBG (P < 0.001–0.003; Table 2). Similarly, serum concentrations of LH and FSH decreased in the DHT group compared with the placebo group. DHT treatment did not affect serum lipid parameters (Table 4). No changes were observed in liver enzymes. Hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit(Hcr) values increased significantly in the DHT group compared with the placebo group (Table 4). In the DHT group, six men had Hb between 170 and 180 g/liter at least once during the treatment (normal range, 135–170), and one subject had Hb of 184 g/liter and Hcr of 55% (normal range 40–54%) at 3 months, but the values decreased to 176 g/liter and 53% at 6 months. There were no major clinical adverse events during DHT treatment. Three subjects experienced mild headache during DHT treatment compared with two subjects in the placebo group. None of the subjects describeds kin irritation during the treatment, but one subject in the DHT group had hair growth on the left shoulder and upper arm. Two subjects in both groups suffered from mild depression during the study. Other reported adverse events were not considered to be related to the treatment.





Discussion

This first placebo-controlled study carried out with DHT demonstrated a number of changes in both clinical and biochemical parameters in response to percutaneous DHT administration in men with relatively low bioavailable serum T levels and andropause symptoms. Treatment with DHT improved the ability to maintain erections and transiently improved early morning erections. However, these changes were small, though significant; therefore, their clinical importance remains uncertain. Six subjects in the DHT group and none in the placebo group dropped out before the end of the trial. We do not have a good explanation why only subjects in the DHT group stopped the study, but the difference in the dropout frequency between the groups was not statistically significant, and none of the reasons for dropping out were related to side-effects of the drug.

Androgens have been shown to have favorable consequences in the central nervous system by having a stimulating and maintaining effect on sexual function in men (17,18). A number of androgen preparations have been used to treat hypogonadism (19). Treatment with percutaneous DHT gel increased serum total DHT levels 5-fold and led to concentrations that were clearly above the normal young adult male range (16). Although serum T concentrations decreased simultaneously with DHT administration by 50–70%, it is apparent that the total androgen effect increased significantly, especially because serum SHBG levels decreased simultaneously. This is supported by the observation that percutaneous T and DHT have an equal androgen effect in patients with hypogonadism (20), and DHT may have even greater pharmacological potency than other androgens (11).Androgen replacement in older men has been reported to increase the sense of well-being (21). In our study we did not find significant effects of DHT gel on well-being or vitality. The reason for this is not clear, but it is possible that many subjects had erectile dysfunction before the study and had great expectations for treatment. As impotence is often multifactorial, and androgen supplementation of older men has generally not met with great success (21, 22), at least some subjects may have been disappointed with the treatment and did not pay attention to general well-being. Furthermore, as in previous studies (21), the placebo effect in this study was significant with regard to several aspects of general wellbeing. In addition, based on the inclusion criteria (T 15 nmol/liter and/or SHBG <30 nmol/liter) the subjects may have had only mild or moderate androgen deficiency. Although the FAI of the study subjects was significantly lower than that of healthy men of the same age and was half that seen in younger men, their serum DHT levels at baseline were comparable. This was expected, because serum DHT levels do not change markedly with advancing age (5), and therefore the measurement of DHT levels may not be useful when considering androgen decline or deficiency in aging men. Furthermore, if some of the effects of androgens, for instance on the central nervous system, are due to metabolism to estrogens, DHT as a nonaromatizable androgen may have a weaker effect. Alternatively, the instruments used to assess subjective symptoms may not be sensitive enough to detect small changes, which is always a problem in studies like this.


As expected and observed previously (15), serum FSH and LH concentrations decreased during DHT treatment as a result of the negative feedback effect. The long-term effect of DHT on testicular function, e.g. on spermatogenesis, is not yet known, but no evidence of irreversible effects exists (20).

It is well known that androgens have an anabolic effect. Androgens increase red cell mass and Hb concentrations mainly through a direct effect on erythropoietin synthesis in the kidneys, and inhibition of androgen secretion decreases Hb concentrations (36). We found that Hb increased significantly as early as after 1 month of DHT treatment. Similar effects on Hcr have been found earlier in long-term use of T in older hypogonadal men (19) and in normal aging males(31).
This anabolic effect must be considered during the follow-up of subjects using DHT or other androgens; Hb and Hcr should be assessed after 3–6 months of treatment, and the dose should be decreased if necessary. Weight and body mass index did not change during the study. The possible effects of DHT on bone density as well as on body composition were not assessed, which may reduce the informativity of the study. These matters were considered carefully before the study, and because no significant changes, especially in bone density, were expected in 6 months of treatment they were not included.





TABLE 1. Characteristics of the subjects
1744471787778.webp





TABLE 2. Effects of DHT treatment on serum hormone parameters
1744471869121.webp





TABLE 4. Effects of DHT treatment on weight, prostatic weight, I-PPS score, and hematological, biochemical, and lipid parameters
1744471953630.webp
 

Attachments

* All subjects administered 5 g DHT (125 mg DHT) or placebo gel daily for the first 30 d, whereafter the dose was adjusted by a outside person (i.e. blind to the principal investigators) on the basis of serum DHT measurement performed 20 d after study entry. If serum DHT was less than 5.8 nmol/liter, the men used a daily dose of 250 mg, if serum DHT was between 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 187.5 mg, and if serum DHT was over 11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 125 mg. The purpose was to reach the upper limit of 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, which has been found to be the range at which a daily dose of 5 g gel is used (12). The dose of placebo was adjusted randomly by an outside person; 30 subjects continued with 5 g, and 30 used either 7.5 or 10 g.


* Serum DHT concentrations were measured by RIA after organic extraction and hydrophobic chromatography. The lower limit of quantification of serum DHT was 0.1 nmol/liter. The normal range for DHT was 1–10 nmol/liter, and the intra- and inter assay coefficients of variation were 9.1% and 6.6%, respectively. In previous studies the basal serum levels of DHT have been found to be 1.5–2.0 nmol/liter in men between 50–70 yr of age (5, 15, 16) and 2.5–3.5 nmol/liter in men between19–29 yr of age (16).


* After 1 month of DHT treatment, 23% of the subjects used a daily dose of 125 mg, 45% used 187.5 mg, and 32% used 250 mg. The serum concentrations of DHT and other hormones are shown in Table 2. For comparison, the FAI and serum DHT concentrations of healthy men are shown in Table 1.


* DHT treatment decreased serum concentrations of E2, T, and SHBG (P < 0.001–0.003; Table 2). Similarly, serum concentrations of LH and FSH decreased in the DHT group compared with the placebo group.


* This first placebo-controlled study carried out with DHT demonstrated a number of changes in both clinical and biochemical parameters in response to percutaneous DHT administration in men with relatively low bioavailable serum T levels and andropause symptoms.

* Treatment with percutaneous DHT gel increased serum total DHT levels 5-fold and led to concentrations that were clearly above the normal young adult male range (16). Although serum T concentrations decreased simultaneously with DHT administration by 50–70%, it is apparent that the total androgen effect increased significantly, especially because serum SHBG levels decreased simultaneously. This is supported by the observation that percutaneous T and DHT have an equal androgen effect in patients with hypogonadism (20),



* As expected and observed previously (15), serum FSH and LH concentrations decreased during DHT treatment as a result of the negative feedback effect. The long-term effect of DHT on testicular function, e.g. on spermatogenesis, is not yet known, but no evidence of irreversible effects exists (20).








Subjects and Methods

Subjects


A total of 120 males, aged 50–70 yr (mean age, 58 yr), participated in this monocenter, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study (Fig. 1, flow chart). Based on a telephone conversation or a clinic visit, 178 subjects were known to fulfill the symptom criteria, and they were asked to come for screening. Of them, 55 failed to enter th estudy because of abnormal lipid or liver parameters, high serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA; 10 g/liter), or other reasons. The subjects were randomized to the DHT (n 60) or the placebo (n 60) group. The randomization codes identifying the treatment were kept in sealed envelopes and were broken only after all clinical and biochemical analyses were completed. None of the envelopes had to be opened before completing the study. Subjects included should have had rarefaction of nocturnal penile tumescence (once or less per wk; frequency of early morning erections together with libido are known to have correlation with serum androgen levels) and at least one of the following andropause symptoms: decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, urinary disorders, asthenia, or depressive mood. In addition, the subjects had to have a total serum T concentration of 15 nmol/liter or less (normal range, 9–32 nmol/liter) and/or an SHBG level greater than 30 nmol/liter (normal range, 14–62 nmol/liter). Although serum T levels of 15 nmol/liter or less and SHBG levels greater than 30 nmol/liter do not define all subjects as being hypogonadal or having low free T, these limits were used together with clinical symptoms to find men who would benefit from the treatment.The number of subjects in each category is given in Table 1. Five subjects in the DHT group and nine in the placebo group (P 0.175) had been treated earlier for impotence problems. The exclusion criteria with regard to prostate were prostate weight greater than 100 g, serum PSA level greater than 10 g/liter, acute prostatitis, abnormal prostate in clinical or ultrasonographic examination, or prostatectomy/transurethral resection of the prostate. The other main exclusion criteria were significant cardiovascular disease, abnormal lipid profile (total cholesterol 7.5 mmol/liter and/or triglycerides 1.7 mmol/liter), alcohol abuse, and uncured cancer. Furthermore, subjects with neurological impotence, major depression, or other psychiatric diseases, and those taking hormones or drugs affecting sexual function, lipid/hormone metabolism (-blockers, methyldopa, clonidine,guanethine thiazide diuretics, spironolactone, digitalis, barbiturates, clofibrate, cimetidine, metochlopramide, or antidepressive and neuroleptic drugs), or hematological parameters were excluded. Three subjects (1 taking DHT: unstable hypertension; 2 taking placebo: coronary heart disease with metoprolol medication and skin cancer) were wrongly included in the study; therefore, 3 additional men were randomized. Six men in the DHT group dropped out before the end of the trial (Fig. 1). The reasons for drop-out were withdrawal of consent (n 2), lack of efficacy (n 2), contact lost (n 1), and acute pyoelonephritis due to prostatitis (n 1). For comparison, the serum concentrations of DHT in 35 healthy men, aged 50–67 yr, and the free androgen index (FAI) in 146 healthy men, aged 20–65 yr, were analyzed.




Protocol

DHT and placebo gel were prepared and packed in identical tubes by Laboratories Besins Iscovesco (Paris, France). Both the study drug and placebo were opalescent gels with alcoholic odor, and they were applied on upper arms/shoulders and on abdomen if necessary. The DHT gel contained a 2.5% solution of DHT. After application the gel dried rapidly in a few minutes. The subjects were asked to wash their hands after application and to pay attention to any skin irritation observed. All subjects administered 5 g DHT (125 mg DHT) or placebo gel daily for the first 30 d, whereafter the dose was adjusted by a outside person (i.e. blind to the principal investigators) on the basis of serum DHT measurement performed 20 d after study entry. If serum DHT was less than 5.8 nmol/liter, the men used a daily dose of 250 mg, if serum DHT was between 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 187.5 mg, and if serum DHT was over 11.6 nmol/liter, the daily dose was 125 mg. The purpose was to reach the upper limit of 5.8–11.6 nmol/liter, which has been found to be the range at which a daily dose of 5 g gel is used (12). The dose of placebo was adjusted randomly by an outside person; 30 subjects continued with 5 g, and 30 used either 7.5 or 10 g. All tubes were returned and weighed to ensure compliance, and no significant failures were observed. The effect of DHT on general well-being was evaluated by questionnaire (13 questions), which was modified from the Psychological General Well-Being scale (13), and 12 questions regarding sexual function were modified from the International Index of Erectile Function(14). For example, the scoring system for the early morning erections was: 1 never, 2 every other month, 3 every month, 4 every other week, 5 every week, 6 two times a week or more. After the screening visit and entry, follow-up visits were made at 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment, and the subjects filled out the questionnaire before entry andat 3 and 6 months.




Laboratory techniques

Serum DHT concentrations were measured by RIA after organic extraction and hydrophobic chromatography. The lower limit of quantification of serum DHT was 0.1 nmol/liter. The normal range for DHT was 1–10 nmol/liter, and the intra- and inter assay coefficients of variation were 9.1% and 6.6%, respectively. In previous studies the basal serum levels of DHT have been found to be 1.5–2.0 nmol/liter in men between 50–70 yr of age (5, 15, 16) and 2.5–3.5 nmol/liter in men between19–29 yr of age (16). Serum T concentrations were measured using a ACS:180 chemiluminescence system with an ACS:180 analyzer (ChironCorp., Emeryville, CA). Serum E2 concentrations were measured by RIA(Orion Diagnostica, Turku, Finland). Serum SHBG, LH, FSH and PSA concentrations were quantified by two-site fluoroimmunometric methods with kits obtained from Wallac, Inc. (Turku, Finland), using a 1235 AutoDELFIA automatic immunoassay system. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 4.0% and 5.6% for T, 5.7% and 6.4% for E2,1.3% and 5.1% for SHBG, 4.9% and 6.5% for LH, 3.8% and 4.3% for FSH,and 1.2% and 3.8% for PSA, respectively. The FAI was calculated according to the equation: (T 100)/SHBG. Hematological analyses and biochemical measurements were performed using approved routine clinical chemistry methods (Oulu University Hospital).




Results

After 1 month of DHT treatment, 23% of the subjects used a daily dose of 125 mg, 45% used 187.5 mg, and 32% used 250 mg. The serum concentrations of DHT and other hormones are shown in Table 2. For comparison, the FAI and serum DHT concentrations of healthy men are shown in Table 1. The score of early morning erection improved significantly in the DHT group during the first 3 months of treatment (from 3.0 to 3.9; P 0.003). The ability to maintain erections in subjects taking DHT improved significantly compared with that in subjects using placebo (Table 3). There were no statistically significant differences in general well-being, libido, mood, or vitality between the groups. However, the placebo effect was statistically significant in several questions: mood, briskness, self confidence, depression, activity, cheerfulness, and relaxation improved in both groups; libido, general interest in everyday life, and energy in the placebo group; and satisfaction with sexual life in the DHT group. Serum PSA concentrations did not change during the treatment. Similarly, prostate size and International Prostate Symptoms Score (I-PPS) remained unchanged (Table 4).

DHT treatment decreased serum concentrations of E2, T, and SHBG (P < 0.001–0.003; Table 2). Similarly, serum concentrations of LH and FSH decreased in the DHT group compared with the placebo group. DHT treatment did not affect serum lipid parameters (Table 4). No changes were observed in liver enzymes. Hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit(Hcr) values increased significantly in the DHT group compared with the placebo group (Table 4). In the DHT group, six men had Hb between 170 and 180 g/liter at least once during the treatment (normal range, 135–170), and one subject had Hb of 184 g/liter and Hcr of 55% (normal range 40–54%) at 3 months, but the values decreased to 176 g/liter and 53% at 6 months. There were no major clinical adverse events during DHT treatment. Three subjects experienced mild headache during DHT treatment compared with two subjects in the placebo group. None of the subjects describeds kin irritation during the treatment, but one subject in the DHT group had hair growth on the left shoulder and upper arm. Two subjects in both groups suffered from mild depression during the study. Other reported adverse events were not considered to be related to the treatment.





Discussion

This first placebo-controlled study carried out with DHT demonstrated a number of changes in both clinical and biochemical parameters in response to percutaneous DHT administration in men with relatively low bioavailable serum T levels and andropause symptoms. Treatment with DHT improved the ability to maintain erections and transiently improved early morning erections. However, these changes were small, though significant; therefore, their clinical importance remains uncertain. Six subjects in the DHT group and none in the placebo group dropped out before the end of the trial. We do not have a good explanation why only subjects in the DHT group stopped the study, but the difference in the dropout frequency between the groups was not statistically significant, and none of the reasons for dropping out were related to side-effects of the drug.

Androgens have been shown to have favorable consequences in the central nervous system by having a stimulating and maintaining effect on sexual function in men (17,18). A number of androgen preparations have been used to treat hypogonadism (19). Treatment with percutaneous DHT gel increased serum total DHT levels 5-fold and led to concentrations that were clearly above the normal young adult male range (16). Although serum T concentrations decreased simultaneously with DHT administration by 50–70%, it is apparent that the total androgen effect increased significantly, especially because serum SHBG levels decreased simultaneously. This is supported by the observation that percutaneous T and DHT have an equal androgen effect in patients with hypogonadism (20), and DHT may have even greater pharmacological potency than other androgens (11).Androgen replacement in older men has been reported to increase the sense of well-being (21). In our study we did not find significant effects of DHT gel on well-being or vitality. The reason for this is not clear, but it is possible that many subjects had erectile dysfunction before the study and had great expectations for treatment. As impotence is often multifactorial, and androgen supplementation of older men has generally not met with great success (21, 22), at least some subjects may have been disappointed with the treatment and did not pay attention to general well-being. Furthermore, as in previous studies (21), the placebo effect in this study was significant with regard to several aspects of general wellbeing. In addition, based on the inclusion criteria (T 15 nmol/liter and/or SHBG <30 nmol/liter) the subjects may have had only mild or moderate androgen deficiency. Although the FAI of the study subjects was significantly lower than that of healthy men of the same age and was half that seen in younger men, their serum DHT levels at baseline were comparable. This was expected, because serum DHT levels do not change markedly with advancing age (5), and therefore the measurement of DHT levels may not be useful when considering androgen decline or deficiency in aging men. Furthermore, if some of the effects of androgens, for instance on the central nervous system, are due to metabolism to estrogens, DHT as a nonaromatizable androgen may have a weaker effect. Alternatively, the instruments used to assess subjective symptoms may not be sensitive enough to detect small changes, which is always a problem in studies like this.


As expected and observed previously (15), serum FSH and LH concentrations decreased during DHT treatment as a result of the negative feedback effect. The long-term effect of DHT on testicular function, e.g. on spermatogenesis, is not yet known, but no evidence of irreversible effects exists (20).

It is well known that androgens have an anabolic effect. Androgens increase red cell mass and Hb concentrations mainly through a direct effect on erythropoietin synthesis in the kidneys, and inhibition of androgen secretion decreases Hb concentrations (36). We found that Hb increased significantly as early as after 1 month of DHT treatment. Similar effects on Hcr have been found earlier in long-term use of T in older hypogonadal men (19) and in normal aging males(31).
This anabolic effect must be considered during the follow-up of subjects using DHT or other androgens; Hb and Hcr should be assessed after 3–6 months of treatment, and the dose should be decreased if necessary. Weight and body mass index did not change during the study. The possible effects of DHT on bone density as well as on body composition were not assessed, which may reduce the informativity of the study. These matters were considered carefully before the study, and because no significant changes, especially in bone density, were expected in 6 months of treatment they were not included.





TABLE 1. Characteristics of the subjects
View attachment 51355




TABLE 2. Effects of DHT treatment on serum hormone parameters
View attachment 51356




TABLE 4. Effects of DHT treatment on weight, prostatic weight, I-PPS score, and hematological, biochemical, and lipid parameters
View attachment 51357
Thanks.
Do you think concomitant use of hCG would mitigate against DHT induced testosterone & E2 suppression in those with secondary hypogonadism?
 

Online statistics

Members online
7
Guests online
549
Total visitors
556

Latest posts

Back
Top