I believe that if you are already a telemedicine patient you will be "grandfathered in" to an 180 day extension, but after that will need to meet with the telemedicine physician in person or do the telemedicine physician <-> local physician group meeting.Does anyone know the deal with being “grandfathered in”? If we have already had a consultation at a telehealth clinic, and are technically a current patient, are the proposed changes applied any differently?
I assume no, but wanted to check anyway.
I talked to Defy, They basically said Ill have to come in to their facility once then back to business as usual if this passesNot a lot of new info but maybe interesting.
The way the political environment is going, states may start banning the prescription of any androgen to a biological female for any reason. Trans, non-binary, QOL, etc.I believe that if you are already a telemedicine patient you will be "grandfathered in" to an 180 day extension, but after that will need to meet with the telemedicine physician in person or do the telemedicine physician <-> local physician group meeting.
I certainly hope this does not go through, at least in its current form. There was a lot of opposition so I am hopeful.
My personal feeling is that if this does go through, the odds of testosterone being descheduled go up quite a bit due to the impact on the trans community.
There is at least one TRT clinic that appears to be planning a local affiliated-physician program to meet compliance. I'm not sure how it will work out. Let's hope hacks like this aren't needed. I'm sure programs like this will increase cost.
It's an extreme extrapolation to get there from the current environment and its focus on minors. I'll be surprised if even one state does this. In contrast, the legalization of marijuana suggests a trend towards permissiveness for adults.The way the political environment is going, states may start banning the prescription of any androgen to a biological female for any reason. Trans, non-binary, QOL, etc.
Never underestimate the power of the far right and when religion gets mixed into politics it can make for a very hostile environment toward anyone that doesn't "fit in."It's an extreme extrapolation to get there from the current environment and its focus on minors. I'll be surprised if even one state does this. In contrast, the legalization of marijuana suggests a trend towards permissiveness for adults.
Puberty blockers and other “gender affirming” treatments for kids should be banned. Doesn’t take a religion to tell anyone with common sense that much, and wanting it to be blocked doesn’t make someone far right. If you ask anyone(I’d bet $10,000 yourself included) 10 years ago if we should be giving children hormones or chopping off their genitals they’d wonder why that was even a question…..yet in 2023 here we are.Never underestimate the power of the far right and when religion gets mixed into politics it can make for a very hostile environment toward anyone that doesn't "fit in."
When politics morphs into religion, religion loses its focus and purpose. I'm both mind and heart boggled by this. Making enemies of our neighbors isn't a solution. All that does is reinforce the concept that the enemy is at the gates. Love your neighbor as yourself. . . .Never underestimate the power of the far right and when religion gets mixed into politics it can make for a very hostile environment toward anyone that doesn't "fit in."
Read more deply into this; its an overeaction.Never underestimate the power of the far right and when religion gets mixed into politics it can make for a very hostile environment toward anyone that doesn't "fit in."
awesome. Annoying we have to wait further to see what comes next. I was hoping we would have a concrete answer this monthDEA Delays Ending Controlled-Substances Prescribing Flexibilities, Buys More Time for Virtual MAT Providers
The DEA is seeking more time before it rolls out its final rules regulating telehealth after the end of the public health emergency.bhbusiness.com
Looks like, as of May 1st, that the DEA has backed down at least temporarily. So come May 11th there won't be any changes to care, at least not yet.
My read of the above article is that it's unclear what will ultimately happen, but the DEA recognizes their proposed rules in its current form probably isn't workable and wants more time to figure out a different solution. I suppose it's possible they go forward with their original rules but it seems unlikely? If they were going to do that, it seems like they wouldn't have bothered to postpone the rule change.
This looks like a win, at least so far, and appears driven by the amount of comments and publicity we generated.
definitely a good sign, but I feel like we’re in the same place. This could still go through, its just a matter of when. Hopefully they just drop the whole thingThis is awesome news.
There are always higher numbers of people that didn’t provide feedback, 40,000 represents only a fraction of people against this proposed law.40 thousand comments?
So basically we’re in Limbo until the final decision is made who knows whenThe link you sent says temporary extension. Am I missing something?
lolTranslation from my past working life. "jesus fucking christ phil, you pissed a lot of people off, including SENATORS!!! 40 thousand comments? what were you thinking??!! warren already hates me because of that run in i had with her last year. you better figure out a better way to do this because I am not spending all summer in hearings when i could be in virginia beach. you have 6 months to figure this out, call some people. get the fuck out of my office"
Is there an indication as to when that would be? Do they have a "by X date" released somewhere?The final rule will come later.