One minor correction: Gonadorelin is not just a GnRH analog; it is bioidentical GnRH. More significantly, and a more deserving target for @Jason Sypolt's ire, is that the video participants seem to be accepting without question that gonadorelin is a simple hCG replacement. One nod to a little complexity is the observation that gonadorelin won't work if the source of one's hypogonadism is in the pituitary—or testicles—rather than the hypothalamus. I have not seen statements about which scenario is more prevalent. If I had to guess I would say that a hypothalamic origin is most common, but I could be wrong.Just saw this on YouTube. Didn’t go deep at all but general observation from these guys.
One minor correction: Gonadorelin is not just a GnRH analog; it is bioidentical GnRH. More significantly, and a more deserving target for @Jason Sypolt's ire, is that the video participants seem to be accepting without question that gonadorelin is a simple hCG replacement. One nod to a little complexity is the observation that gonadorelin won't work if the source of one's hypogonadism is in the pituitary—or testicles—rather than the hypothalamus. I have not seen statements about which scenario is more prevalent. If I had to guess I would say that a hypothalamic origin is most common, but I could be wrong.
In any case, the superficial treatment in the video means there's no mention of the fact that GnRH is normally delivered in pulses, which are typically no more than a few hours apart. Nor is there mention of the existence of negative feedback from estrogens at the pituitary, which could potentially reduce the effectiveness of exogenous GnRH. I have more background information in these two posts:
Is GnRH suppression hurting us?
Admittedly the last thing we need is some other nebulous danger to worry about that may not even exist. Read on at your peril. TL;DR: Testosterone replacement therapy suppresses the production of GnRH. Receptors for GnRH are found in places besides the pituitary. One animal model suggests GnRH...www.excelmale.comPituitary restart while on TRT: promising initial results with GnRH plus enclomiphene
TL;DR: Over a period of seven weeks, treatment with GnRH and enclomiphene raised LH and FSH from around 0.1 mIU/mL to about 1.0 mIU/mL, even though TRT and hCG dosing were continued. Subjective results have been encouraging. I had written previously on the subject of GnRH suppression on TRT...www.excelmale.com
Thanks for the link. It reminds me that I really need to update the pituitary restart thread with the latest information. One item of interest is that I tried a period without the SERM and with a minimal TRT dose—26 mg pure T/week. After 3.5 weeks the gonadotropins were down 30% from their previous values. Subjective results generally weren't too bad, except that testicular discomfort was becoming downright intrusive, and that led me to resume the SERM. So unfortunately I don't know whether or not the gonadotropins would have continued to decline....
Gonadorelin to Replace HCG
Gonadorelin cannot be used successfully by itself as a replacement for hCG for men on exogenous testosterone in the fashion I am seeing it done by guys posting on here. In addition to the excellent summary by @youthful55guy on the need to pulse a gnrh agonist 4-8 times a day, there’s also the...forums.t-nation.com
Thanks for the link. It reminds me that I really need to update the pituitary restart thread with the latest information. One item of interest is that I tried a period without the SERM and with a minimal TRT dose—26 mg pure T/week. After 3.5 weeks the gonadotropins were down 30% from their previous values. Subjective results generally weren't too bad, except that testicular discomfort was becoming downright intrusive, and that led me to resume the SERM. So unfortunately I don't know whether or not the gonadotropins would have continued to decline.
Meds (T, AI and Gonadorelin), plus all standard labs and doc tele visits for $200/mo. They used to rx hCG, but say they've successfully used Gonadorelin since the change forced them to switch.I doubt this is true with a twice per week program, but there is only one way to find out. Get on it and send us results a month later. Also, ask them if they can guarantee those types of LH increases.
What is the cost per month for their product?
How many micrograms of gonadorelin is that?... They don't mention frequency but I called and they are doing 2 (0.5ml) self-administered subcutaneous injections per week.
...
Good question. 100 IUs a week, 50 at each injection. Not sure how much water is mixed with the powder.How many micrograms of gonadorelin is that?
I believe that this doubt of Gonadorelin twice or 3 times a week is enough to maintain the size of the testicles and consequently the amount of sperm. It will be great to know how far it goes. A more economical and viable alternative.I called Royal Medical Center myself to see if I could wring out any more information. It seems likely the protocol is 50 or 100 mcg of gonadorelin twice a week. The gentleman I talked with wasn't completely sure, but said he thinks the concentration is 0.2 mg/mL, and the dose size is 0.5 mL. Unfortunately he had no information on the clinical trials. When pressed he said he thought almost all of their patients are on aromatase inhibitors. He said they target a total testosterone level of ~800+ ng/dL. It sounds like they try to adjust estradiol to be in the reference range, while being mindful of the subjective results.
I suspect the lab work was done within an hour of a gonadorelin injection, and that LH pretty rapidly goes back to low levels. If so it's surprising that two big pulses a week can prevent testicular atrophy and provide decent subjective results. Natural men have on the order of 100 pulses a week.
The video below reports a few more individual lab results, ranging from small LH increases—0.5 mIU/mL—to gigantic ones—46.5 mIU/mL. These are around the 8:00 mark. Kind of annoying to have ads in a video that is essentially an ad itself.
Yea, it is perhaps reasonable to guess that high enough doses could theoretically provide coverage between the peaks and valleys. I wonder though if long-term exogenous GNRH agonists use has negative effects.I believe that this doubt of Gonadorelin twice or 3 times a week is enough to maintain the size of the testicles and consequently the amount of sperm. It will be great to know how far it goes. A more economical and viable alternative.
Frequent pulses is what the research studies use, yes. But is that what we need?Frequent pulses are needed.
It's true that if you have a way to constantly infuse GnRH then it does in time shut everything down; the pituitary becomes insensitive to it. In fact this is how most of the GnRH analogs work—intentionally: they have much longer half-lives than GnRH, which results in overexposure of the pituitary....Royal is running labs within 1-2 hours of injecting Gonadorelin. So of course it drops precipitously after that timeframe until the next injection in a couple days. The head doc commented that this is on purpose because constant stimulation actually leads to lower LH (possibly based on the studies above), whereas a pulse can provide symptom relief.
...
I'd like to see some hard data on this. Basically he's imputing a very long half-life to whatever abstract process he's sketching on his timeline. I'd like to know if testicular volume would actually have this pattern—that is, be above the "active" line even with infrequent pulses. What about endogenous testosterone production?...
This guy thinks differently. Does Gonadorelin need to be pulsed?
@JA Battle what do you think of his reasoning? Is it possible that infrequent pulses are all that's needed to preserve minimum testicular function?
The monkey study you linked used continuous infusion. Not frequent pulses. I don’t have time to watch at moment but if I get a chance I will comment.Frequent pulses is what the research studies use, yes. But is that what we need?
This guy thinks differently. Does Gonadorelin need to be pulsed?
@JA Battle what do you think of his reasoning? Is it possible that infrequent pulses are all that's needed to preserve minimum testicular function?