By what mechanism would nandrolone increase progesterone at any dose? Or are you just referring to progestogenic activity and not actual progesterone? Isn't nandrolone likely to be suppressive of endogenous production? Is the effect of nandrolone at progesterone receptors additive with respect to progesterone, except attenuated to 22% because of its lower affinity?Normal therapeutic nandrolone doses will not increase progesterone - or only by a point or two if anything. Personally I would cut back on progesterone a bit and add it back slowly after being on nandrolone to be on the safe side (I am overly cautious) but I would expect zero interaction.
This is exactly what occurs. In hindsight this is exactly what I felt on it, estrogen dominance despite nandrolone not increasing estrogen significantly.By what mechanism would nandrolone increase progesterone at any dose? Or are you just referring to progestogenic activity and not actual progesterone? Isn't nandrolone likely to be suppressive of endogenous production? Is the effect of nandrolone at progesterone receptors additive with respect to progesterone, except attenuated to 22% because of its lower affinity?
That's confusing. I thought the point of nandrolone was to reduce estrogenic and androgenic effects. Progesterone itself has some aromatase-inhibiting activity, and it also downregulates estrogen receptors. It seems plausible that nandrolone does the latter when it activates progesterone receptors.This is exactly what occurs. In hindsight this is exactly what I felt on it, estrogen dominance despite nandrolone not increasing estrogen significantly.
It seems it would make sense to supplement with either pregnenolone or progesterone when on Nandrolone.
Nandrolone was an add-on to my TRT protocol. So I'm speculating that if my progesterone was low, even if my e2 was only slightly above range, I was feeling estrogen dominance.That's confusing. I thought the point of nandrolone was to reduce estrogenic and androgenic effects. Progesterone itself has some aromatase-inhibiting activity, and it also downregulates estrogen receptors. It seems plausible that nandrolone does the latter when it activates progesterone receptors.
That's confusing. I thought the point of nandrolone was to reduce estrogenic and androgenic effects. Progesterone itself has some aromatase-inhibiting activity, and it also downregulates estrogen receptors. It seems plausible that nandrolone does the latter when it activates progesterone receptors.
But it's also possible that HPTA suppression leaves the body without proper feedback about "its own needs." If this is the case and some downstream hormone levels are relatively low then it may well be better to target healthy average levels. It's also guesswork as to how much pregnenolone to take and in what form. Oral administration probably yields very different and less natural results than a parenteral route....
I would supplement pregnenolone tho. But I’d always supplement it when shutting down the HPTA since LH is important for metabolism of cholesterol into preg. Then the body decides what to do with that supplemental pregnenolone based on its own needs. I’d leave it alone with that instead of trying to bring downstream hormones to arbitrary numbers based on science established in natural adult males.
That's confusing. I thought the point of nandrolone was to reduce estrogenic and androgenic effects. Progesterone itself has some aromatase-inhibiting activity, and it also downregulates estrogen receptors. It seems plausible that nandrolone does the latter when it activates progesterone receptors.
There is more uncertainty. However, there are still hormones downstream of pregnenolone that have independent importance. DHEA, for example.Sure thing but healthy based on what? If you’re on a nandrolone base then cellular ratios are completely different so serum levels mean… not much?
...
As is pointed out in the YouTube comments section, the doctor erroneously ordered the immunoassay free T test, which reacted to the nandrolone. In reality his free testosterone is probably negligible. Interesting that the patient's subjective results weren't too bad. Still, he's wise to be getting off of that regimen....
Deca base 300/wk
EQ is in and out
GH is in there as well.
...
Do you have a source for this? Nandrolone has a lower affinity for the progesterone receptor than progesterone, which reduces its relative activity. But I've so far found nothing saying that the effect after binding is weaker. The relatively large doses of nandrolone seem sufficient to promote normal and above progestogenic activity.It’s a partial agonist, so it replaces progesterone while exerting a weaker effect. So that triggers estrogen dominance. Read up on partial agonists.
It’s a partial agonist, so it replaces progesterone while exerting a weaker effect. So that triggers estrogen dominance. Read up on partial agonists.
Do you have a source for this? Nandrolone has a lower affinity for the progesterone receptor than progesterone, which reduces its relative activity. But I've so far found nothing saying that the effect after binding is weaker. The relatively large doses of nandrolone seem sufficient to promote normal and above progestogenic activity.
The idea is that nandrolone is competing with endogenous progesterone to bind at the progesterone receptors. It only has 20% or so of the binding affinity of progesterone, but in sufficient amounts it would be displacing some progesterone from the receptors. If nandrolone activates the progesterone receptor as much as progesterone then the displacement of progesterone doesn't matter in terms of overall activity. But if nandrolone is weaker than progesterone in receptor activation, as claimed by @benaoao, then it's possible for overall progestogenic activity to be reduced. However, sources such as Wikipedia refer to nandrolone as "a potent progestogen", and also list it as a PR agonist without qualification.Progesterone supposedly inhibits aromatase and downregulates estrogen receptors. If nandrolone partially agonizes progesterone receptors, how would this create estrogen dominance?
Yes, I think this is likely. Of course this assumes there's not additional suppression of endogenous progesterone caused by the nandrolone. Otherwise, assuming nandrolone is a full agonist of PR, then you could multiply the weight of the nandrolone you're taking by some factor, maybe 20%, and view that as the equivalent amount of progesterone you're getting.So do u think someone on test with nandrolone would require less exogenous progesterone than someone on just test alone?
I have seen that post, which says that vitamin E can antagonize estrogen receptors, inhibit aromatase, and also down-regulate aromatase expression. Of course it also says that "Vitamin E reduced androgen signaling without affecting androgen metabolism." This could be counterproductive.Was just listening to a podcast this morning where the guy from Ray peats forum, Haidu, was mentioning how progesterone has some aromatase inhibiting properties, as well as downregulates estrogen receptors, just like u said. He also said vitamin E does these two exact things as well. Have u ever heard or read about vitamin E inhibiting aromatase and downregulating estrogen receptors?