How can any direct observation be 'conspiracy theory' ? Who would be defending against Holocaust denial today if not for survivor video testaments? Perhaps you should consider this conversation a final opportunity secure your true history before we are all gone. Or better yet tape the video testimony of myself and others.So many conspiracy theories, so little evidence.
If you're not in a high risk group then you should not fear too much for your personal safety. The U.S. now has the most confirmed cases, but as of yesterday these amounted to only 0.035% of the population, about one in 3,000. Better yet, the recent growth trend may be rolling over, looking more linear than exponential.I'm scared about it, we're having vitims here in Brazil too.. really scared.
It is nearly 35 years to the day that I took my friend to the mass testing site. People here are asking: "What is the origin of COVID?" The answer is, for now, it does not matter. Try and learn something from the tragedy of HIV.So much verbiage, so little said. Still waiting for something that remotely resembles evidence. In the case of the coronavirus origin, this could be science-based criticism of the reasoning used to conclude natural origins. But that takes effort and knowledge, whereas spewing baseless accusations is easy, but also grounds for being ignored and ridiculed.
Not true. There is no scientific consensus that patient 0 was infected at the seafood market. Claiming it is so is politically motivated.Fact check: Coronavirus originated in China, not elsewhere, researchers and studies say
An article circulating on social media claims the coronavirus did not originate in China. We examine the research and rate this claim false.www.yahoo.comThe consensus among experts researching the virus places the beginning of its spread at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China.
SARS-CoV-2 need not have been GMO or intentionally or accidentally released to have a relationship with bio-weapon research. The article offers nothing but speculation.More highlights from what was published in Nature.Coronavirus: Scientists suggest theory that COVID-19 has lived inside humans for years
A study recently published in Nature highlighted the fact that the virus is definitely not man-made, and is the product of natural evolution.www.yahoo.com
I await your listing of all the opposing, published, peer-reviewed studies....
Cherry-picking studies in an attempt to prove a point is contrary to the theme of this forum. ...
I await your listing of all the opposing, published, peer-reviewed studies.
Published works are convincing that mRNA vaccines are safe. No mode of permanent harm has been described. It does not interact with cellular DNA they say.I understand what you mean buy "great achievements". However, we have all seen what Pharma and Biotechs have done in the past is not all good for us. In about 10 years, we will know if the people who got these injections will have benefited from them.
The 2 words in bold are the ones we need to validate with more experience. Unfortunately experience comes with time. So as we all know.....only time will tell.Published works are convincing that mRNA vaccines are safe. No mode of permanent harm has been described. It does not interact with cellular DNA they say.
I overcame my lack of trust and completed both doses of vaccine knowing that SARS-CoV-2 is highly capable of inflicting permanent harm including that to the reproductive system even in those young males who show few or no systems.
No one can promise that anything injected is 100% safe. People need to make their own decisions after reviewing the scholarly papers. What is disturbing is those who are vaccine hesitant as a result of nonsense and disinformation they read on social media.
As for the above mention of "antibodies were discovered in the blood samples way back..." Horsepucky. This is exactly what I warn of. The serum antibody test is notoriously inaccurate for SARS-CoV-2 infection.