madman
Super Moderator
Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline Part I
Peter N. Schlegel, MD, et al
Purpose: The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ ASRM Guideline. Part I outlines the appropriate evaluation of the male in an infertile couple. Recommendations proceed from obtaining an appropriate history and physical exam (Appendix I), as well as diagnostic testing, where indicated.
Materials/Methods: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline from January 2000 through May 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology.
Results: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding the evaluation of male infertility as well as the association of male infertility with other important health conditions. The detection of male infertility increases the risk of subsequent development of health problems for men. In addition, specific medical conditions are associated with some causes of male infertility. Evaluation and treatment recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure).
Conclusion: The presence of male infertility is crucial to the health of patients and its effects must be considered for the welfare of society. This document will undergo updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.
BACKGROUND
The overall goal of the male evaluation is to identify conditions that may affect the management or health of the patient or their offspring. The specific goals of the evaluation of the infertile male are to identify the following:
potentially correctable conditions;
irreversible conditions that are amenable to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) using the sperm of the male partner;
irreversible conditions that are not amenable to the above, and for which donor insemination or adoption are possible options;
life- or health-threatening conditions that may underlie infertility or associated medical comorbidities that require medical attention; and
genetic abnormalities or lifestyle and age factors that may affect the health of the male patient or of offspring particularly if ART are to be employed. In this guideline, the term “male” or “men” is used to refer to biological or genetic men.
GUIDELINE STATEMENTS
Assessment
Lifestyle Factors and Relationships Between Infertility and General Health
Diagnosis/Assessment/Evaluation
Imaging
SUMMARY
Evaluation and management of men in a couple with infertility involve a step-wise process of evaluation and consultation regarding treatment options. An increasing understanding of general health conditions associated with male infertility is valuable for counseling, as well as diagnosis of the underlying cause of fertility. Evaluation should proceed in parallel for both male and female members of a couple to optimize treatment success.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The causes of male infertility, including their genetic basis, have only been superficially explained at this time. The interactions of male infertility with other health conditions require a deeper understanding as well. Sperm clearly affect stages of embryo development, implantation, and maintenance of pregnancy via mechanisms that are incompletely defined at this time. However, the use of ART allows a unique insight into the interaction of sperm with egg and the development of the resulting embryo. The potential to recover spermatogenesis for men who have lost germ cells throughout the testis and are azoospermic will require novel interventions with stem cell technology, possibly coupled with additional techniques to support germ cell development. Since men with severely impaired spermatogenesis appear to often have underlying genetic defects responsible for their testicular dysfunction, understanding of the specific cause of spermatogenic dysfunction may be critical for successful interventions. Fortunately, progress continues to be made on each of these fronts.
Peter N. Schlegel, MD, et al
Purpose: The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ ASRM Guideline. Part I outlines the appropriate evaluation of the male in an infertile couple. Recommendations proceed from obtaining an appropriate history and physical exam (Appendix I), as well as diagnostic testing, where indicated.
Materials/Methods: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline from January 2000 through May 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology.
Results: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding the evaluation of male infertility as well as the association of male infertility with other important health conditions. The detection of male infertility increases the risk of subsequent development of health problems for men. In addition, specific medical conditions are associated with some causes of male infertility. Evaluation and treatment recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure).
Conclusion: The presence of male infertility is crucial to the health of patients and its effects must be considered for the welfare of society. This document will undergo updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.
BACKGROUND
The overall goal of the male evaluation is to identify conditions that may affect the management or health of the patient or their offspring. The specific goals of the evaluation of the infertile male are to identify the following:
potentially correctable conditions;
irreversible conditions that are amenable to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) using the sperm of the male partner;
irreversible conditions that are not amenable to the above, and for which donor insemination or adoption are possible options;
life- or health-threatening conditions that may underlie infertility or associated medical comorbidities that require medical attention; and
genetic abnormalities or lifestyle and age factors that may affect the health of the male patient or of offspring particularly if ART are to be employed. In this guideline, the term “male” or “men” is used to refer to biological or genetic men.
GUIDELINE STATEMENTS
Assessment
Lifestyle Factors and Relationships Between Infertility and General Health
Diagnosis/Assessment/Evaluation
Imaging
SUMMARY
Evaluation and management of men in a couple with infertility involve a step-wise process of evaluation and consultation regarding treatment options. An increasing understanding of general health conditions associated with male infertility is valuable for counseling, as well as diagnosis of the underlying cause of fertility. Evaluation should proceed in parallel for both male and female members of a couple to optimize treatment success.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The causes of male infertility, including their genetic basis, have only been superficially explained at this time. The interactions of male infertility with other health conditions require a deeper understanding as well. Sperm clearly affect stages of embryo development, implantation, and maintenance of pregnancy via mechanisms that are incompletely defined at this time. However, the use of ART allows a unique insight into the interaction of sperm with egg and the development of the resulting embryo. The potential to recover spermatogenesis for men who have lost germ cells throughout the testis and are azoospermic will require novel interventions with stem cell technology, possibly coupled with additional techniques to support germ cell development. Since men with severely impaired spermatogenesis appear to often have underlying genetic defects responsible for their testicular dysfunction, understanding of the specific cause of spermatogenic dysfunction may be critical for successful interventions. Fortunately, progress continues to be made on each of these fronts.