Deleted member 16042
Member
Then why according to the late Dr Crisler do low SHBG guys exctrete so much more free testosterone in their urine and apparently have higher spikes/ lower troughs of Free testosterone.
Excess excretion is expected if the low-SHBG guy is dosed so that his total serum testosterone matches the high-SHBG guy. In my previous example, if the guy with an SHBG of 10 nmol/L has his testosterone dose doubled so that his serum testosterone matches the 1,000 ng/dL of the high-SHBG guy, then his excretion rate is doubled—as a result of doubled free testosterone.Then why according to the late Dr Crisler do low SHBG guys exctrete so much more free testosterone in their urine and apparently have higher spikes/ lower troughs of Free testosterone.
I'd be very interested in any references on this. My understanding is that SHBG primarily serves as a reservoir, which can restore depleted free testosterone, but at a much slower rate than albumin. More recently it was discovered that SHBG can deliver testosterone directly in some situations, but it's not clear to me how significant this is relative to overall activity. As I see it, there's still no clear explanation of the benefits of frequent injections for low-SHBG guys, though estradiol could well be a contributing factor.I understand the dosing frequency issue as related to relative metabolism of free T vs SHBG bound T. These are two different molecules with different tendencies in metabolism, I see nothing contrary to Crisler's explanation as I would not expect the T bound to SHBG molecule to have the same rate of uptake and elimination as Free T.
...
Once T is cleaved from the ester it either becomes free T or is bound to SHBG or Albumin.
Free T is very short acting and is used up rapidly.
Guys with low SHBG have much more essentially released into the system as free T which is used up rapidly and also rapidly excreted in urine if there is excess not bound to SHBG. These guys essentially burn up the supply faster and levels subsequently crash much faster, so smaller more frequent doses are appropriate to help keep levels more stable rather than running out after 2-3 days and crashing before the next dose. In terms of numbers, some of the guys on this forum have very low SHBG in the teens.
T bound to SHBG remains in the body much longer.
More SHBG means you bind up more T and it is retained in the body over a longer time period. As such, guys who have high SHBG tend to need larger cumulative total dose injecting T to achieve good Free T levels since so much is bound by SHBG. They tend to have lower Free T in relation to total T. It is kind of like there is a better long term storage system in place with higher SHBG, and this man does not burn up the available free T as fast. However, some men with higher SHBG like me actually also do better on more frequent dosing as well. For me theoretically it helps reduce estrogen by taking smaller more frequent doses compared to larger less frequent doses. My SHBG is currently ~52 which is high but not radically so. It can reach quite a bit higher in some men.
The bottom line is larger every other week or weekly doses create a "roller coaster" effect where Free T trough level is too low to feel good. The half life of T is about 8 days which means you lose close to half the amount of T you inject in about a week. 50% lower level can cause ill effects. Low SHBG guys burn up the Free T even faster and some need every day dosing to feel OK.
Thanks, man, for that explanation. I understand SHBG now a little better. I just had labs done this week including SHBG and am waiting results. But I think my SHBG is usually in the 20s. I am currently on a once a week regimen injecting 150mg (.75cc) on Mondays and taking .25mg anastrozole on Tuesdays and .1mg anastrozole on Fri and Sun. My T is usually around 1200 the day after injection (Tuesday) and 500 seven days later before the next injection. (sometimes I measured 700). Sometimes I think I feel a little different by Sat and Sun when my T is lower. Should I "feel" a difference between 1200 and 500/600? I am thinking of going back to twice weekly.
But I think my SHBG is usually in the 20s. I am currently on a once a week regimen injecting 150mg (.75cc) on Mondays and taking .25mg anastrozole on Tuesdays and .1mg anastrozole on Fri and Sun.
Not really about how SHOULD you feel, the real question is how DO you feel? If you are feeling good throughout the week, that's great and unless something changes go with it.
It also does not hurt to experiment (Within reason) so if you try splitting your dose, maybe you'l learn something. You could end up feeling better or worse. It is all individual. The catch is, changes take around 4-6 weeks to stabilize, so don't expect the next steady state for a while. Sometimes changes can feel good in that adapting phase. other times things can feel bad, but you don't know the end result until you fully wait it out. It takes me even longer to fully reach equilibrium especially when lowering dose, around 2-3 months to fully adjust.
By the numbers, your peak vs trough is pretty dramatic. If SHBG is in the high 20s, and if you do actually have low SHBG, you may do better on every three or every other day schedule. If it is more like 20, maybe EOD or daily, and very possibly lower cumulative dose for total weekly more like 100 or below. YMMV, just seems this kind of dosage and schedule tends to work better for lower SHBG guys who have posted to this forum.
Total T is an inferior reference as to how your protocol is effecting you.
Track your Free T and E2 sensitive LC/MS/MS. Base any AI dosing on E2 number and symptoms, and pay attention to high vs low E2 symptoms.
yeah but even using your analogy since the upper tub drains more slowly the lower tub will empty before and remain low throughout because the upper tub isn't flowing as fast. however a high is hbg guys drain would be smaller and flow less in the lower tub which means it would actually fill with water and hold on to the testosterone which is what is happening.I'd been hoping someone would make a statement like this so we could have a more detailed discussion. The problem is that low-SHBG guys cannot "burn up the supply faster" because the limiting factor is the rate of supply, not the rate of clearance. That is, I've seen no evidence that the rate of testosterone absorption from an injected depot is affected by one's SHBG. Yet this absorption rate is the primary driver of the apparent serum half-life of testosterone, as opposed to the consumption side, in which the effective metabolic clearance rate is directly influenced by SHBG.
Consider this analogy with two tubs of water, one draining into another: the upper tub of water represents an injected depot of a testosterone ester. The lower tub of water represents testosterone in the body. The lower tub has a decent-sized drain opening that represents the testosterone being metabolized and eliminated. The upper tub has a small drain leading to the lower tub. In each tub the rate of flow out of the drain is proportional to the height of water in the particular tub. SHBG represents the size of the lower tub's drain, larger for low SHBG, smaller for high SHBG. The point is that this does not affect the upper tub's slow draining, which is what sets the apparent serum half-life.
Then you need to keep researching it because the correlation is clearly established lower shbg results in higher free t numbers with the same dosage compared to a person that has high shbg.I'd be very interested in any references on this. My understanding is that SHBG primarily serves as a reservoir, which can restore depleted free testosterone, but at a much slower rate than albumin. More recently it was discovered that SHBG can deliver testosterone directly in some situations, but it's not clear to me how significant this is relative to overall activity. As I see it, there's still no clear explanation of the benefits of frequent injections for low-SHBG guys, though estradiol could well be a contributing factor.
You neglect the important difference stated between these imaginary tubs and real tubs: these tubs can never fully empty because the flow rate out is proportional to how much is in them and to the drain sizes. So the lower the level the slower they drain. This is how things work in the body: the clearance rate is proportional to concentration.yeah but even using your analogy since the upper tub drains more slowly the lower tub will empty before and remain low throughout because the upper tub isn't flowing as fast. however a high is hbg guys drain would be smaller and flow less in the lower tub which means it would actually fill with water and hold on to the testosterone which is what is happening.
What 's clearly established is that in two guys with the same total serum testosterone, the one with lower SHBG has greater free testosterone than the other, assuming similar albumin. The correlation you seem to be referring to is going to be pretty weak. Which is to say that if you pick two guys at random and give them the same testosterone dose, then the likelihood that the one with lower SHBG will have higher free T is probably only a few percent over 50-50.Then you need to keep researching it because the correlation is clearly established lower shbg results in higher free t numbers with the same dosage compared to a person that has high shbg.
Would I be considered to be leaning toward becoming a high SHBG guy per labs range?What 's clearly established is that in two guys with the same total serum testosterone, the one with lower SHBG has greater free testosterone than the other, assuming similar albumin. The correlation you seem to be referring to is going to be pretty weak. Which is to say that if you pick two guys at random and give them the same testosterone dose, then the likelihood that the one with lower SHBG will have higher free T is probably only a few percent over 50-50.
Borderline. SHBG of about 40 is not too much above the 25-35 nMol/L that might be considered optimal.Would I be considered to be leaning toward becoming a high SHBG guy per labs range?
Thank youBorderline. SHBG of about 40 is not too much above the 25-35 nMol/L that might be considered optimal.
TRT will lower your SHBG a little bit and I don't expect this protocol to be ideal for you since you more than likely find SHBG <20 on your next set of labs.
I am getting ready to switch to twice weekly.
Your lab results are not typical of men with low SHBG, Total T is above mid-range and Free T is near the top. You do not see a large decline in levels after 6 days either.
Twice weekly should do nicely.