Jimstigator
New Member
Post injection pain.
I don't know if this will help, but I believe the half life for deca durabolin is 6 days.
Interesting graphs for propionate and especially enanthate at 250mg injection every 1,2,3 or 4 week intervals.
http://bloodworks.com.au/docs/Pharmacology of testosterone preparations.pdf
I know this is an old thread, but I learned something new today. Had I read this thread first I would never have believed what I learned about half lives. So for anyone else just learning this stuff:
Rjsnuruf looking at the graph at 14.7 when increasing injection times. Th graph proves your first statement to be true. Injecting weekly compounds the testosterone half lives, thats why it levels out at 80. The others show increasing the injection time gaps never lets the level go above forty, and those are some nasty looking troughs.
Steroid Esters: Drug Active Half-Life Table:
Formate 1.5 days
Acetate 3 days
Propionate 2 days
Phenylpropionate 4.5 days
Butyrate 6 days
Valerate 7.5 days
Hexanoate 9 days
Caproate 9 days
Isocaproate 9 days
Heptanoate 10.5 days
Enanthate 10.5 days
Octanoate 12 days
Cypionate 12 days
Nonanoate 13.5 days
Decanoate 15 days
Undecanoate 16.5 days
In a nut shell, if you have Testosterone Cypionate and Nandrolone Cypionate and Boldenone Cypionate, all the of the compounds will have a half like of around 12 days.
Deca Durabfolin is Nandrolone with the Decanoate ester so the half- life is 15 or so days.
Equipoise by name has the Undecanoate ester attached to the steroid molecule and it's half-life will be 16-17 days.
Very interesting. I wonder if this info is correct. 12 days for cypionate half life is almost double the 7 day half life that I think most of us thought it had. I don't know which is correct, I'm just saying thats a very big gap between the two
To reach a steady state with the 12 day half life it would take 60 days vs the 35 days if the half life is 7 days. That would mean testosterone cypionate would basically take an extra month to reach steady state than previously thought
Lastly, I've always heard and read that testosterone enanthate had a slightly longer half life than cypionate, by a day or two. In this chart it shows enanthate actually having a slightly SHORTER half life by 1.5 days. Lots of conflicting info in this chart. Again, I honestly have no clue which is right, just wanted to bring up these couple points about it
Very interesting. I wonder if this info is correct. 12 days for cypionate half life is almost double the 7 day half life that I think most of us thought it had. I don't know which is correct, I'm just saying thats a very big gap between the two
To reach a steady state with the 12 day half life it would take 60 days vs the 35 days if the half life is 7 days. That would mean testosterone cypionate would basically take an extra month to reach steady state than previously thought
Lastly, I've always heard and read that testosterone enanthate had a slightly longer half life than cypionate, by a day or two. In this chart it shows enanthate actually having a slightly SHORTER half life by 1.5 days. Lots of conflicting info in this chart. Again, I honestly have no clue which is right, just wanted to bring up these couple points about it
In the document I posted, it said: In addition, pharmacokinetics are influencedby the oily vehicle, the injection site and the injection volume (Minto et al.
1997).
So all of those things will influence half life. What oily vehicle, ingestion site and volume. From reading the forum, one can see different reactions to what on the surface may seem like the same protocol, but this might be influenced by not just what ester is used to carry testosterone enanthate but also the injection site.
I see many take about different esters in their testosterone enanthate, and possible allergies to one or the other.
Once you find a protocol that works for you, I can see how any number of small changes can affect your outcome.
This is the full study which has been previously posted on the forum.
Thanks, it seems like a very good study of Nandrolone and looks in detail at different sites for injection of Nandrolone.
But it doesn't speak to the pharmacokinetics of testosterone enanthate or testosterone undecanoate and the differences caused by being dissolved in soybean oil Vs castor Vs tea seed oil. Or whatever, I know there are other oils used, not sure of the full list.
I would think one could safely "assume" that the different site injections in this study of Nandrolone would also apply the various testosterone esters. It would be an assumption, but it seems like a good gut assumption.
Thanks, it seems like a very good study of Nandrolone and looks in detail at different sites for injection of Nandrolone.
But it doesn't speak to the pharmacokinetics of testosterone enanthate or testosterone undecanoate and the differences caused by being dissolved in soybean oil Vs castor Vs tea seed oil. Or whatever, I know there are other oils used, not sure of the full list.
I would think one could safely "assume" that the different site injections in this study of Nandrolone would also apply the various testosterone esters. It would be an assumption, but it seems like a good gut assumption.
Thanks, it seems like a very good study of Nandrolone and looks in detail at different sites for injection of Nandrolone.
But it doesn't speak to the pharmacokinetics of testosterone enanthate or testosterone undecanoate and the differences caused by being dissolved in soybean oil Vs castor Vs tea seed oil. Or whatever, I know there are other oils used, not sure of the full list.
I would think one could safely "assume" that the different site injections in this study of Nandrolone would also apply the various testosterone esters. It would be an assumption, but it seems like a good gut assumption.