I feel for you. We've run a number of posts over the years on the unreliability of many (most) free testosterone values. You can pull your own labs at a surprisingly affordable cost at www.discountedlabs.com. Many of us use them.I thought it would be ordered but the dr didn't ask for it.
Tired of this place giving me the run around.
Has anyone here taking clomid ever been on danazol? I'd really like to hear about your experience.
Here's my experience with adding danazol along with clomid.
Context: Before I tried danazol, I had been taking clomid (12.5 mg/day) for about a year.
It got my T levels up to 600-700 ng/dL. Subjectively I would describe how I felt on clomid 12.5 ED as "pretty okay" most of the time. Even though I too experienced the "estrogenic" side effects that most clomid users complain about, it was still better than I had felt in a long time. Over this time period my SHBG had crept from 18 to around 30.
I first heard about danazol on the ATM forum from a patient who had taken both it and clomid. Decided to try danazol out.. 50 mg every other day - if I remember rightly - in addition to my regular 12.5 mg/day of clomid. (I might mention that I had asked Dr. Crisler on his forum about it and he didn't see a problem with trying it.)
My experience: Almost immediately after starting (like within a couple of days) I began to feel really great. Mood and energy went up sharply. I felt as if I had finally found the cure to what ailed me.
Unfortunately, after about 6 weeks or so, I stopped feeling good. In fact I started feeling quite terrible (much worse than before I had started danazol). Labs showed my total T-levels had plummeted (in addition to the SHBG decrease), so it must have had a stronger suppressive affect on my HPTA than clomid's "enhancing" effect.
I believe I felt so good for those 6 weeks at the start due to previously SGBG-bound T being released into my system until it was all used up.
I still wonder if I had tried clomid/danazol in a different proportion (i.e. higher dose of clomid vs. lower dose of danazol) if I would've faired better.
I was unaware that one should not take danazol if you are not already on TRT at the time I was taking it. It was meant to lower SHBG. When I saw one of your posts I threw them away. The results of pre/post LH levels are unknown to me at this time. I simply wanted to show the forum what happened. Hopefully things will return to "normal" soon.
Funnt thing this AM I was on my throne and had Jay Campbells book out and i was right on the page about Danazol for lowering SHBG.
Tough, if not impossible, to successfully use danazol long term if NOT HPTA suppressed. Too many variables as it interacts with the androgen receptors, the estrogen receptors, the progesterone receptors, and glucocorticoid receptors IN ADDITION to inhibiting many of the upstream hormone enzymes AND its interaction with SHBG. In fact, even in HPTA suppressed men it does a good job of lowering SHBG and increasing free T, yet often lags on the subjective side (likely due to the multiple/complex MOA mentioned above).
Thank you for weighing in, Dr. Saya. After this, I don't think I'll ever consider trying danazol again.
Do you happen to know if danazol negatively affects the lipid profile? My numbers were pretty bad (low HDL, high LDL & cholesterol) when I had labs done shortly after quitting danazol although I don't have any "control" evidence to claim that danazol caused it.
Well, a well known TRT guy who's new book has been reviewed only recently with praise is the one who put me on it. It impacted me in an awful way..... Like I said, it was a nightmare.
That being said, I don't really blame him. I take a good amount of responsibility for my own health and healthcare.