He said that? I wonder what makes some ranges for tests “good”, and others “bad”. I thought most ranges come from them taking the average highs, and the average lows, from a group consisting of very young men, very old men, and everything in between. Different labs have different ranges, and some are definitely better than others. Maybe that’s what he is referring to. For example, quest’s ranges for E2 are absolutely horrible. It’s not even a range, they just say it should be less than “x”.
Here’s a couple ranges for free E2, maybe they can help interpret your results when you find out your free E2 level.
Quest’s range for free E2 is (<0.45)
Here’s another range I found on the internet, not sure which lab it comes from. I prefer this one though. (0.2-1.5)
Man, makes me sad that TRT is so behind. Makes me sad knowing that testing free E2 is going to eventually be as important as testing free T, but currently nobody does it, and when you bring it up to top doctors at
Defy, they question why you’re even getting it done. To me, that’s like a top doctor at
Defy questioning why someone would get a free T level over a total T level. I understand that we don’t know the free E2 ranges as much as we know what the free T range should be, and there’s like no studies done on males and free E2, but just bums me out knowing that we are so behind the 8 ball with this whole E2 thing.