What is the more is better protocol?It's counterintuitive but on the "more is better" protocol I don't need HCG, no visible shrinkage.
Right, it's sarcasm. So far for me the best dose in terms of mental well-being and mental performance is about double the natural upper FT level. It happened to be also a level where my ejaculation volume is back to normal without HCG and I didn't notice any testicles shrinkage compared to using HCG.What is the more is better protocol?
At a higher testosterone level have you noticed problems which might be associated with high DHT such as prostate problems or hair loss?Right, it's sarcasm. So far for me the best dose in terms of mental well-being and mental performance is about double the natural upper FT level. It happened to be also a level where my ejaculation volume is back to normal without HCG and I didn't notice any testicles shrinkage compared to using HCG.
I'm not claiming that this is the way to go, I'm just sharing how things have worked for me. I'm not saying "more is better", but maybe one should not be intimidated or scared off by some folks here, and experiment also with a higher dose when it comes to therapeutic TRT.
I noticed accelerated hair loss already at mid normal range levels. Many men that start/need TRT are at their mid end forties and it seems that many men at that age tend see more hair loss naturally... I have had no prostate issues. DHT is difficult to assess. In my opinion it's better when the body gets enough raw material (T) to produce DHT where it is needed instead of adding a DHT derivative.At a higher testosterone level have you noticed problems which might be associated with high DHT such as prostate problems or hair loss?
Let me fill in the nuances. The problem with more-is-better thinking is that it leads to high starting doses and going up from there when there are problems. The victims of this mentality never get a chance to experience a range of physiological testosterone levels. I have argued that there are evolutionary reasons for the normal range to be preferred; these have led to the best reproductive success, which should be a reasonable proxy for overall success in life. The low-and-slow approach to TRT is not a new concept—the late Dr. Crisler was promoting it many years ago..... I'm not saying "more is better", but maybe one should not be intimidated or scared off by some folks here, and experiment also with a higher dose when it comes to therapeutic TRT.
I never disagreed with that. I myself started low, and that has been my advice to anyone needing to start TRT.The low-and-slow approach to TRT is not a new concept—the late Dr. Crisler was promoting it many years ago.
That's the important context for the guy who thinks that the 100 mg TC/week he's on is a low starting dose.I never disagreed with that. I myself started low, and that has been my advice to anyone needing to start TRT.
I asked because I know that my DHT level is high and I do have issues with BPH.I noticed accelerated hair loss already at mid normal range levels. Many men that start/need TRT are at their mid end forties and it seems that many men at that age tend see more hair loss naturally... I have had no prostate issues. DHT is difficult to assess. In my opinion it's better when the body gets enough raw material (T) to produce DHT where it is needed instead of adding a DHT derivative.
I’ve been on TRT for about 12 years. I started low and finally got up to a level that normalized my symptoms. After I felt like things were going well I began but by bit lowering my dose to find the minimum dose that still seemed to resolve my issues. Then if I notice symptoms I bump it back up a bit. I am currently using 140mg test cyp per week divided into two doses. Along with that I’m injecting 300UI HCG twice per week. I’m not sure how much testosterone the HCG adds. If I quit the HCG due to cost and availability as I have done in the past I’ll have to bump up my testosterone dose.Let me fill in the nuances. The problem with more-is-better thinking is that it leads to high starting doses and going up from there when there are problems. The victims of this mentality never get a chance to experience a range of physiological testosterone levels. I have argued that there are evolutionary reasons for the normal range to be preferred; these have led to the best reproductive success, which should be a reasonable proxy for overall success in life. The low-and-slow approach to TRT is not a new concept—the late Dr. Crisler was promoting it many years ago.
In any case, the point is that there is not any strident objection to experimentation with modestly higher testosterone levels. It's just that this experimentation should occur after gathering experience with lower levels—those attained with daily testosterone absorption in the range of 4-9 mg. With a frame of reference established you can better evaluate if higher doses are helping or hurting. In addition, there should be well-informed consent. TRT, particularly at higher doses, is disruptive of the hormonal milieu; it can perturb upwards of 20 other hormones. Being able to reduce some side effects with supraphysiological dosing does not imply that a good hormonal balance has been restored.
The price looks reasonable. What has your experience been with it? I see that it comes in 5,000UI vials rather than the 10,000IU Pregnyl vials. The information says to use immediately or as directed by your doctor. Do you use it all at once or do you do multiple doses from a vial and how long do you store the mixed vials?I ordered HCG from ReliableRX at very reasonable prices, and it is the real pharmaceutical product. No need to look for something else.
I use higher levels for years. No hair loss or prostate issues. However, everyone is different.At a higher testosterone level have you noticed problems which might be associated with high DHT such as prostate problems or hair loss?
How many of those 20 hormones can you name, Cat?Let me fill in the nuances. The problem with more-is-better thinking is that it leads to high starting doses and going up from there when there are problems. The victims of this mentality never get a chance to experience a range of physiological testosterone levels. I have argued that there are evolutionary reasons for the normal range to be preferred; these have led to the best reproductive success, which should be a reasonable proxy for overall success in life. The low-and-slow approach to TRT is not a new concept—the late Dr. Crisler was promoting it many years ago.
In any case, the point is that there is not any strident objection to experimentation with modestly higher testosterone levels. It's just that this experimentation should occur after gathering experience with lower levels—those attained with daily testosterone absorption in the range of 4-9 mg. With a frame of reference established you can better evaluate if higher doses are helping or hurting. In addition, there should be well-informed consent. TRT, particularly at higher doses, is disruptive of the hormonal milieu; it can perturb upwards of 20 other hormones. Being able to reduce some side effects with supraphysiological dosing does not imply that a good hormonal balance has been restored.
Which brand have you found to be most reliable and do they ask you to send the a copy of your prescription?I ordered HCG from ReliableRX at very reasonable prices, and it is the real pharmaceutical product. No need to look for something else.
When you asked last year I came up with 18: pregnenolone, DHEA, progesterone, kisspeptin, GnRH, LH, FSH, estradiol, prolactin, DHT, hepcidin, androstenedione, androstenediol, cortisol, TSH, T3, T4, rT3...How many of those 20 hormones [affected by TRT] can you name, Cat?