current protocol for preserving testicular function with TRT

Various options for increasing testosterone while preserving testicular function:


TreatmentProsCons
Conventional TRT + hCGEffective, usually preserves fertility, higher testosterone levels if neededCost, sometimes extra injections, often excess aromatization, upstream HPTA suppression (LH/FSH/GnRH/kisspeptin)
Conventional TRT + hCG + FSH/hMGEffective, best option for fertility with conventional TRT, higher testosterone levels if neededGreater cost, sometimes extra injections, often excess aromatization, upstream HPTA suppression (LH/FSH/GnRH/kisspeptin)
hCG monotherapyEffective, usually preserves fertilityCost, often excess aromatization, often upstream HPTA suppression (LH/FSH/GnRH/kisspeptin)
hCG + FSH/hMGEffective, good for fertilityCost, often excess aromatization, often upstream HPTA suppression (LH/FSH/GnRH/kisspeptin)
Testosterone nasal gel monotherapyPreserved HPTA function and fertility, bio-identical testosteroneCost? Unpleasant delivery, less dosing flexibility, 2-3 daily doses
Testosterone buccal troche monotherapyPreserved HPTA function and fertility, bio-identical testosteroneNot well characterized for TRT, finding appropriate doses may be complicated, 2-3 daily doses
Enclomiphene monotherapyPreserved or enhanced HPTA function and fertility, good lab numbers likely, simple oral deliveryMixed subjective results, uncertainty about long-term effects of non-endogenous drug
Oral testosterone + enclomipheneConvenience of oral delivery, possible subjective improvement over enclomiphene monotherapyCost? Uncertainty about long-term effects of non-endogenous drug enclomiphene
Conventional TRT + gonadorelin + enclomiphenePartial HPTA preservation, higher testosterone levels if neededMultiple daily injections for best results. Uncertainty about long-term effects of enclomiphene
Micronized testosterone suspension, 2-3 daily microdosesPossible preserved HPTA function and fertility, bio-identical testosteroneNot well characterized, multiple daily injections, speculative
Conventional TRT + enclomiphene + cistanche extractPossible preserved HPTA function and fertility, higher testosterone levels if needed, simple oral add-onNot characterized, speculative, uncertainty about long-term effects of non-endogenous drugs
Kisspeptin-10 monotherapyMore HPTA preservation, similar to endogenous hormoneNot well characterized, speculative
Gonadorelin (GnRH) monotherapyBio-identical hormone, partial HPTA preservationMultiple daily injections
 
Thanks a million.
Is hCG monotherapy worth trying in a 34-year-old who is quite symptomatic with T levels around 300? He is interested in potentially preserving fertility?
Would the dosing be the same as above?
 
Last edited:
...
Is hCG monotherapy worth trying in a 34-year-old who is quite symptomatic with T levels around 300? He is interested in potentially preserving fertility?
Would the dosing be the same as above?
HCG monotherapy is a reasonable choice given the concerns about fertility. Anecdotes tend to disfavor it with respect to subjective results. This may be due to the potential for excess aromatization. But some guys seem happy with it. Let me throw in Dr. Saya's fertility ranking to give you an idea of where some of these treatments stand:

A *very* generalized ranking of relative fertilities (with top being most fertile):
1. Clomid/SERM treatment
2(A). HCG + HMG (or lyophilized FSH)
2(B). Baseline no treatment (no HPTA suppression via TRT, AAS, HCG mono, etc) - assuming no significant degree of primary/secondary/tertiary dysfunction.
3(A). HCG monotherapy (does in fact result in HPTA suppression, especially at higher doses, but *may* move up to #2 in select cases of SECONDARY/TERTIARY hypogonadism)
3(B). TRT + HCG (as we know many men are still able to maintain adequate fertility to conceive)
4. TRT/AAS with no concurrent HCG.

Usually dosing for hCG monotherapy is higher than what I mentioned above for use with TRT. In these cases 1,000 IU per week would be about the lowest I've heard about. Doses easily range into the thousands or more. I don't think there's any harm in a low-and-slow approach to dosing. Higher doses are likely to be better for fertility, but subjective results may then deteriorate. Guys have been known to temporarily tolerate higher doses and not feeling great until a pregnancy is achieved. But for the longer term it's important to feel decent.

When it is available and practical I would favor a fast-acting testosterone product, such as nasal gel, buccal troches and possibly suspension. These are likely to ameliorate the symptoms of hypogonadism with the fewest side effects and least hormonal disruption.
 

Online statistics

Members online
12
Guests online
130
Total visitors
142

Latest posts

Back
Top