Pacman
Active Member
Here are two examples:
Site 1 -
Anabolic Steroids: types, uses and risks | Steroid .com
Site 2 -
insidebodybuilding.com
The info on the sites themselves appears to be very accurate. But then they have ads for these obvious BS legal alternatives.
There are A LOT of these sites.
What is the story behind them?
Are these sites created just to make money, and they put a ton of encyclopedic style info just to get you to trust them?
It just seems so dumb to provide such educational info on a bunch of steroids and then to offer some herbal supplement as an "alternative", as if it is even comparable.
What's going on there?
Site 1 -
Anabolic Steroids: types, uses and risks | Steroid .com
Site 2 -

Anavar Results: Before and After Pictures (4-Week Progress) - Inside Bodybuilding
See typical Anavar results for a male and female, with before and after pictures following 4 weeks and 5 weeks of supplementation.

The info on the sites themselves appears to be very accurate. But then they have ads for these obvious BS legal alternatives.
There are A LOT of these sites.
What is the story behind them?
Are these sites created just to make money, and they put a ton of encyclopedic style info just to get you to trust them?
It just seems so dumb to provide such educational info on a bunch of steroids and then to offer some herbal supplement as an "alternative", as if it is even comparable.
What's going on there?