madman
Super Moderator
Abstract
Background: To compare the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse subcutaneous infusion with combined human chorionic gonadotropin and human menopausal gonadotropin (HCG/HMG) intramuscular injection have been performed to treat male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) spermatogenesis.
Methods: In total, 220 idiopathic/isolated HH patients were divided into the GnRH pulse therapy and HCG/HMG combined treatment groups (n=103 and n=117, respectively). The luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were monitored in the groups for the 1st week and monthly, as were the serum total testosterone level, testicular volume and spermatogenesis rate in monthly follow-up sessions.
Results: In the GnRH group and HCG/HMG group, the testosterone level and testicular volume at the 6-month follow-up session were significantly higher than were those before treatment. There were 62 patients (62/117, 52.99%) in the GnRH group and 26 patients in the HCG/HMG (26/103, 25.24%) group who produced sperm following treatment. The GnRH group (6.2±3.8 months) had a shorter sperm initial time than did the HCG/HMG group (10.9±3.5 months). The testosterone levels in the GnRH and HCG/ HMG groups were 9.8±3.3 nmol/L and 14.8±8.8 nmol/L, respectively.
Conclusion: The GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion successfully treated male patients with HH, leading to earlier sperm production than that in the HCG/HMG-treated patients. GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion is a preferred method.
5. Conclusion
Our study suggested that GnRH pulse infusion therapy simulates the physiologic secretion of the human GnRH pulse, which is more consistent with the physiologic state. Compared with the combined treatment of HCG/HMG, GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion can promote spermatogenesis faster. Therefore, GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion is an optimal choice for the treatment of spermatogenesis in patients with HH.
Background: To compare the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse subcutaneous infusion with combined human chorionic gonadotropin and human menopausal gonadotropin (HCG/HMG) intramuscular injection have been performed to treat male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) spermatogenesis.
Methods: In total, 220 idiopathic/isolated HH patients were divided into the GnRH pulse therapy and HCG/HMG combined treatment groups (n=103 and n=117, respectively). The luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were monitored in the groups for the 1st week and monthly, as were the serum total testosterone level, testicular volume and spermatogenesis rate in monthly follow-up sessions.
Results: In the GnRH group and HCG/HMG group, the testosterone level and testicular volume at the 6-month follow-up session were significantly higher than were those before treatment. There were 62 patients (62/117, 52.99%) in the GnRH group and 26 patients in the HCG/HMG (26/103, 25.24%) group who produced sperm following treatment. The GnRH group (6.2±3.8 months) had a shorter sperm initial time than did the HCG/HMG group (10.9±3.5 months). The testosterone levels in the GnRH and HCG/ HMG groups were 9.8±3.3 nmol/L and 14.8±8.8 nmol/L, respectively.
Conclusion: The GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion successfully treated male patients with HH, leading to earlier sperm production than that in the HCG/HMG-treated patients. GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion is a preferred method.
5. Conclusion
Our study suggested that GnRH pulse infusion therapy simulates the physiologic secretion of the human GnRH pulse, which is more consistent with the physiologic state. Compared with the combined treatment of HCG/HMG, GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion can promote spermatogenesis faster. Therefore, GnRH pulse subcutaneous infusion is an optimal choice for the treatment of spermatogenesis in patients with HH.