I’ve been seeing that symptoms may be considered more important than levels for diagnosing and agreeing to treat low testosterone.
But could the inverse be true? I’ve never fully recovered sexually, and I’m wondering if you take levels as secondary for treatment (alleviating negative symptoms are seen as most important) are there people who should have higher levels after treatment, even if those new levels are above what is recommended?
But could the inverse be true? I’ve never fully recovered sexually, and I’m wondering if you take levels as secondary for treatment (alleviating negative symptoms are seen as most important) are there people who should have higher levels after treatment, even if those new levels are above what is recommended?