Early Detection of Prostate Cancer

[madman]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Convincing your PCP partners to screen for the early warning signs of prostate cancer does not have to be complicated. Learn how to develop an easy-to-follow risk stratification pathway to share with your PCP partners in this 12-minute talk from E. David Crawford, MD, Editor-in-Chief of Grand Rounds in Urology and Professor of Urology at the University of California, San Diego.

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

 

[madman]

Making prostate cancer screenings helpful

How can we make prostate cancer screenings more helpful? Prof. Hendrik Van Poppel, MD, PhD has performed more than 2500 radical prostatectomies. For eight years, he had been the director of the European School of Urology (ESU), before becoming EAU Adjunct Secretary General, responsible for...

www.excelmale.com

 

[Jake_from_StateFarm]

Interesting, thank you for this.
I started TRT at 50 yrs with a Urologist at 100mg T/wk.
My PSA was .9 ng/ml while on finasteride.
In three years, I had one PSA reading bounce up to 1.4 ng/ml but all the other 6 month readings have been either 1.1 or 1.2 ng/ml. My digital exams have been normal.

Prostate cancer runs in the family. One of my cousins popped for prostate cancer and his brother got nervous and insisted he have a biopsy for a 3.8 ng/ml PSA reading and very slight enlargement (while in his early 60s) and he tested positive for cancer cells. Scary to hear that the Uro didn't even think 3.8 was concerning and resulted in cancer. This PSA test seems antiquated.